產業的競爭與供應網絡的相互抗衡有關，此現象也就是Gomes-Casseres（1994）所提及的集團與集團之間的競爭。然而，供應鏈整合並非憑空而來，必須有適當的作法加以整合。本文以交易成本理論及社會網絡方法探討統治機制如何將供應鏈轉變為妥善整合的蛛網網絡。本研究以台灣中衛生產體系作為實證對象，從中心廠55份有效問卷的資料進行線性迴歸分析，研究結果顯示：夥伴的選擇、專屬租的管理、創造共識與關係規範對網絡整合有正向的影響，而有助於朝向蛛網網絡轉化，至於監控夥伴貢獻與行為則無顯著影響。

Industry-specific competition exists between supply chain networks. Gomes-Casseres (1994) referred to this phenomenon as group vs. group competition. Supply chain integration does not occur in a vacuum. Based on transaction cost theory and social network approach, this study explains how a supply chain can become a well-integrated spider-web network through governance mechanisms. The results of a linear regression analysis of 55 central firms' surveys which are listed in Taiwanese Central-Satellite Production System indicate that selecting partners, managing rent appropriation, creating shared value and relational norms have positive effects on supply chain integration and further in transforming into a spider-web network, whereas monitoring the partner's contributions and behavior has no significant effect.