文章詳目資料

臺灣園藝

  • 加入收藏
  • 下載文章
篇名 高溫、淹水及乾旱對甘藷葉綠素螢光之影響
卷期 58:4
並列篇名 The Effect of High Temperature, Waterlogging, and Drought on Chlorophyll Fluorescence of Sweetpotato
作者 林冠宏黃薇綺羅筱鳳
頁次 315-325
關鍵字 最高量子產量光化學淬熄非光化學淬熄電子傳遞速率有效光量子產量maximum quantum efficiency photochemical quenching nonphotochemical quenching electron transport rate effective quantum yield
出刊日期 201212

中文摘要

甘藷‘臺農57號’、‘臺農66號’及‘桃園2號’種植於生長箱中,設定日/夜溫24/20
℃、光強度500 μmol·
-2
·s
-1
、每日光週期16 h、相對濕度80%,30天後分別進行高溫試
驗(38/35℃處理 13 天)、乾旱試驗(不給水 22 天)及淹水試驗(水位維持至栽培介質表面
45 天)。每次取樣選成熟葉片遮光 40 min 做暗適應後,使用葉綠素螢光儀測定暗適應
葉片之最小螢光值(Fo)、光適應葉片之最小螢光值(Fo’)、暗適應葉片之最大螢光值
(Fm)、光適應葉片之最大螢光值(Fm’)、暗適應葉片之螢光變量(Fv)、暗適應葉片光系
統 II 光化學的最高量子效率(Fv/Fm)、閃光前穩定狀態之螢光值(Fs)、光適應葉片之光
化學淬熄(qP)、葉片從暗適應到光適應之非光化學淬熄(qN)、葉片從Fm至Fm’之非光
化學淬熄(NPQ)、光適應葉片 PSII 之電子傳遞速率(ETR)、光適應葉片 PSII 的有效光
量子產量(ФPSII)。結果顯示三品種葉綠素螢光對不同逆境之敏感性,自高至低依序為高
溫、乾旱、淹水。高溫處理13天期間,‘桃園2號’ 6 h之 NPQ比另兩品種高,最快受
高溫影響;而‘臺農66號’在高溫11 與13 天Fv/Fm為三品種中最低、13天之qN亦為
三品種中最高,長期而言‘臺農66號’葉綠素螢光表現最不耐高溫。乾旱22 天期間,‘臺
農 66 號’於乾旱 2-3 與 7 天之 ETR 皆比另兩品種低,最早受乾旱影響,但 14 與 22 天
之 qN 為三品種中最低;‘臺農 57 號’乾旱 13 天之 NPQ、19 天之 Fv/Fm 比其他兩品種
高,其葉綠素螢光表現較耐旱。淹水 45 天期間,‘臺農66 號’於 15-16 與 26 天之 ФPSII
比其他兩品種低,14與23天之qN、以及5-6、14與23天之NPQ亦比其他兩品種高,
於淹水中早期‘臺農66號’葉綠素螢光表現最敏感 ; 但‘桃園2號’於淹水42與44天Fv/Fm
為三品種中最低,故淹水晚期‘桃園2號’葉綠素螢光表現最不耐淹水。甘藷三品種於高
溫逆境下Fv/Fm 於6 h即顯著降低,可做為高溫耐受性篩選之參考。

英文摘要

The cuttings of sweetpotato ‘Tainung No. 57’, ‘Tainung No. 66’, and ‘Taoyuan No. 2’ were planted in a
growth chamber under 80% relative humidity, 500 μmol·m-2
·s
-1
photostnthetic photon flux, day 24℃/night 20
℃, and 16-h photoperiod conditions for 30 days. Plants were then received three treatments: high temperature
(38/35℃ for 13 days), drought (water withholding for 22 days), and waterlogging (above medium level for
46 days), respectively. At each sampling, mature leaves were dark-adapted for 40 min followed by the
measurements of minimal fluorescence from dark-adapted leaf (Fo), minimal fluorescence from light-adapted
leaf (Fo’), maximum fluorescence from dark-adapted leaf (Fm), maximum fluorescence from light-adapted
leaf (Fm’), variable fluorescence from dark-adapted leaf (Fv), maximum quantum efficiency of PSII
photochemistry from dark-adapted leaf (Fv/Fm), the steady-state value of fluorescence immediately prior to
the flash (Fs), photochemical quenching of PSII (qP), nonphotochemical quenching of leaf from dark- to
light-adaption (qN), nonphotochemical quenching of leaf from Fm to Fm’ (NPQ), electron transport rate
through PSII (ETR), effective quantum yield of PSII (ФPSII) with a mini-Pam. The results showed that the
sensitivity from high to low of chlorophyll fluorescence in three sweetpotato cultivars followed the order of
high temperature, drought, and waterlogging. During 13 days of 38/35℃ treatment, ‘Taoyuan No. 2’ showed
higher NPQ at 6 h than the other two cultivars. ‘Taoyuan No. 2’ was affected earliest by high temperature.
Among three cultivars, ‘Tainung No. 66’ showed the lowest Fv/Fm on days 11 and 13, and the highest qN on
day 13 after treatments. Chlorophyll fluorescence of ‘Tainung No. 66’ exhibited the lowest tolerance to high
temperature in long term. During 22 days of drought, ETR of ‘Tainung No. 66’ was lower than other two
cultivars on days 2-3 and 7. ‘Tainung No. 66’ was affected earliest by drought, while showed the lowest qN
on days 14 and 22. In ‘Tainung No. 57’, NPQ on day 13 and Fv/Fm on day 19 were higher than other two
cultivars. ‘Tainung No. 57’ was the most drought-tolerant cultivar, as shown by chlorophyll fluorescence.
During 45 days of waterlogging, ΦPS II on days 15-16 and 26 of ‘Tainung No. 66’ were lower, while qN on
days 14 and 23, and NPQ on days 5-6, 14 and 23 were higher than other two cultivars. In the early-mid stage
of waterlogging, chlorophyll fluorescence of ‘Tainung No. 66’ was the most sensitive. However, ‘Taoyuan
No. 2’ showed the lowest Fv/Fm among three cultivars on days 42 and 44, indicating ‘Taoyuan No. 2’ the
least tolerance to waterlogging in the late stage of waterlogging. After 6 h under high temperature, the three
sweetpotato cultivars exhibited reduced Fv/Fm, which might be a good indicator for tolerance screening.

相關文獻