文章詳目資料

臺大管理論叢 ScopusTSSCI

  • 加入收藏
  • 下載文章
篇名 海外直接投資對台灣生技廠商營運績效影響之研究
卷期 23:1
並列篇名 Analysis of FDI on Performance of Taiwan’s Biotech Firms
作者 李揚鄭舜仁李威龍夏松喬
頁次 151-174
關鍵字 生技廠商國際直接投資研發Biotech firmFDIR&DScopusTSSCI
出刊日期 201212

中文摘要

人類基因體計畫於2003 年完成人類基因解碼,開啟「後基因時代」。許多國家紛紛加
速發展生技產業,擬定策略、推動各項計畫搶佔先機,台灣亦積極將生技產業列為「兩
兆雙星」計畫的產業之一。台灣生技廠商除了在國內積極發展之外,亦從事海外直接投
資(FDI) 以期能夠提昇自身的競爭力與效率。本研究採用非射線差額變量模型探討海外
直接投資對台灣生技廠商之經營績效影響,並進一步將其分解成純技術效率、規模效率、
及混合效率。樣本取自於台灣經濟新報資料庫,包括63 家廠商,共計188 筆觀測值,
研究期間為2003 年至2005 年。實證結果顯示:FDI 可有效提升台灣生技廠商之混合效
率及規模效率成分,且降低資本無效率;此外,台灣生技廠商較適當的研發策略為較高
之研發投資以增加新產品研發成功之機會,或專注於製造生產之低度研發投資策略。其
他發現包括:(1) 台灣生技廠商的效率偏低,尚有73.75%的改善空間(2) 若忽略混合效率,
大約高估台灣生技廠商效率達37.91%;(3) 無效率的主要來源為原物料無效率。

英文摘要

After the completion of human genome project (HGP) in 2003, biology went into “postgenome
era.” Many countries have marked different approaches in craving out a niche in the
biotech arena. Taiwan also proposed the “Two Trillions, Twin Stars plan” to advance biotech
industry. Taiwan’s biotech firms not only expanded in the domestic market, but also engage
in foreign direct investment (FDI) in order to enhance their competitiveness and efficiency.
This study applies the slack-based measure (SBM) to analyze how FDI affects the operating
efficiency of Taiwan’s biotech firms. We further decompose the technical efficiency into
three components: mixed efficiency, pure technical efficiency, and scale efficiency. The data
set, obtained from Taiwan Economic Journal, consists of 63 Taiwan’s biotech firms for
2003-2005. The empirical results indicate that FDI can effectively increase the mix
efficiency and scale efficiency. In addition, the appropriate R&D strategies of Taiwan’s
biotech firms should either invest massively in R&D in order to enhance the likelihood of
development of new products, or focus on production with a little investment in R&D. Other
findings include: (1) On average, Taiwan’s biotech firms could increase their efficiencies by
73.75 percent if all firms operated on the efficiency frontier; (2) If we omit the mix
efficiency, we may overestimate technical efficiency about 37.91 percent; (3) The primary
source of inefficiency results from the raw material inefficiency.

相關文獻