本文透過女性主義的批判觀點，探討大學生在學術參與和非學術參與中的性別差異情形。在學術參與方面，女性大學生雖然優於男性，但是多數男性大學生卻因選擇男性學類，而進入就業市場中的高薪工作，反之，女性大學生特別是中下階層女性卻大多選擇女性學類，也因此而進入就業市場中的低薪工作；另外在非學術參與方面，男性大學生相較於女性大學生來得積極，相對地也排擠到參與學術性活動的時間與機會，然而因為男性大學生所擁有的「男性特質」等優勢條件，因此不僅仍然獲致高薪工作，也趁此鞏固了男性的優勢地位。本文進一步針對高等教育中的資本主義市場化現象與隱身其中的父權體制結構進行批判，並提出建議，以供後續研究者之參考。

Through a feminist perspective, this paper aims to explore gender differences in the academic and non-academic participations among college students. Although female college students surpass males in academic participation, but most males get opportunities to acquire wellpaying jobs in the employment market by choosing male subjects, on the contrary, females especially those at the lower-middle rank end up entering into the fields offering low-paying jobs in the market thus as for nonacademic participation, males are found to be more positive compared to females, and such may limit them from participating in the academic activities more or less, but in terms of advantages derived from the "masculinity" males have, not only they are still more favored over females for well-paying jobs, but the consolidated status of men remains strong. Furthermore, this paper as well provides criticism towards the phenomenon of capitalist market and the patriarchal system hidden within, as well as recommendations for future researches.