《唐闕史》一書唐高彥休撰。「四庫全書」收子部、小說家類、異聞之屬。該書廣為《太平廣記》、《淵鑑類函》、《天中記》等書所徵引，其中《太平廣記》徵引尤多。可惜的是迄今為止，少有學者對該書作深入研究。余嘉錫與胡玉縉二位先生都認為該書「蓋非全本」。那麼，能否從群書中蒐羅原書的佚文，以探求該書原貌？筆者在研究過程中，發現余嘉錫《四庫提要辨證》有關《唐闕史》的部分論述有誤，本文藉此以補正之。此外，比較《唐闕史》各版本之異同，特別是《太平廣記》徵引條文與今本《唐闕史》間行文的異同，是為本文撰寫之目的。

　　《Tang Chueh Shih》(《唐闕史》) is written by Kao-yen Hsiu(高彥休)in Tang Dynasty, and it belongs toTzu Pu(子部), the category that contains of novels which covers mysteries in 《Ssu Ku Chuan Shu》(四庫全書). The contents of 《Tai Ping Kuang Chi》(《太平廣記》)、《Yuan Chien Lei Han》(《淵 鑑類函》)、《Tien Chung Chi》(《天中記》)quoted mostly from《Tang Chueh Shih》, and《Tai Ping Kuang Chi》 quoted from it the most. Unfortunately, there is rarely scholar making a study of 《Tang Chueh Shih》 up to now. Both Chia-hsiYu(余嘉錫) and Chin-yu Hu(胡玉縉) consider that book is not the entire one. Therefore, whether we can collect some lost articles from those books to restore the original version. During the process of researching, some writer found that there is something wrong about《Tang Chueh Shih》 in Chia-hsiYu 《Ssu Ku Ti Yao Pien Cheng》(《四庫提要辨證》), and this essay revises and corrects from it. In addition, another goal of this essay is comparing the identical and diverse parts of different versions, especially the differences between the quotations of《Tai Ping Kuang Chi》() and the lines of《Tang Chueh Shih》.