我國憲法第16條規定，人民有請願、訴願及訴訟之權，為了落實此一憲法要求，國家除了應開放法院救濟管道外，在行政救濟方面，完善的行政訴訟制度必須具備實效性，亦即人民權利因國家行政機關行使公權力所受到之侵害，即得依法訴請獲得即時救濟。而人民在進行行政訴訟期間，必須擇定正確的訴訟程序，始可獲得有效救濟，為了避免在進行訴訟期間，因時間冗長進行而使當事人之權利損害擴大，故在行政爭訟程序中訂定暫時權利保護制度，停止執行之規定即是該制度之一環，藉此得使人民獲得有效之救濟。本文即是針對行政訴訟法及訴願法之暫時性權利保護的基本概念及各種程序予以說明，文中並參酌數則最高行政法院實務見解進行分析探討，針對我國暫時性權利保護制度之實務運作提出建言，以提供人民適當且即時之權利保護，作為未來之展望。

According to the article 16 of Constitution of the Republic of China "The people shall have the right of presenting petitions, lodging complaints, or
instituting legal proceedings", the country ought to open up the remedy by fulfilling the Constitution demands. By the administrative remedy, it should be provided with actual effect in administrative litigation. In the other words, the people whose right is injured by a government agency's administrative action can get the prompt remedy. To avoid the party's right injured during the longwinded litigation, we need a temporary remedy in the system of administrative litigation. In this thesis, author intends to consider a temporary remedy that can be applied in the administrative appeal and administrative litigation. Besides, the study consult the Supreme Administrative Court judgments about temporary remedy and propose suggestion for the actual effect in administrative litigation.