文章詳目資料

軍法專刊

  • 加入收藏
  • 下載文章
篇名 兩岸協議與共同打擊海上犯罪之研究-以受僱大陸漁船船員問題及走私大陸農、漁、畜產品類犯罪為中心
卷期 59:2
並列篇名 Research on Cross-Strait Agreements and Joint Campaign against Marine Crimes
作者 周成瑜
頁次 57-72
關鍵字 走私兩岸協議漁事糾紛大陸船員SmugglingCross-strait agreementFishing disputesContinental crew
出刊日期 201304

中文摘要

2009 年6月25日雙方簽署之「海峽兩岸共同打擊犯罪及司法互助協議」在合
作範圍中,確定嚴重的海上犯罪納入主要議題之一,即走私犯罪、組織偷渡罪及劫
持船舶罪,藉此與一般之漁事糾紛做區隔。同年底另簽署「海峽兩岸漁船船員勞務
合作協議」,建立官方合作機制及對加強兩岸漁船船員保障,納入仲介機關聯繫責
任,避免海上喋血事件發生。雖然依目前情況看來,以此管道偷渡的案件隨之銳減,
也減少海上遣返航次,然而是否以此身分隨船入境之大陸船員,違反契約義務行為,
均可用送返方式,由仲介機關處理,仍值得探討。
至於海上走私大陸農漁產品入境問題,雖屬我方打擊犯罪重點,惟因雙方對走
私罪定義不同,且執法人員均在己方實際管轄的海域內執法,缺乏直接聯繫管道,
往往只能查緝己方人民,藉由兩岸協議平台通報及時能逮捕他方罪犯的,似乎並不
多見。本文亦將提出境內查緝對金馬海域實務見解、執法機關聯繫及舉證困境,探
討深化該部分之司法互助能量。

英文摘要

June 25, 2009, the two sides signed an "Joint Campaign Against Crimes Across the Taiwan Straits and mutual legal assistance agreement on judicial branches ofthe two sides." in the scope ofc ooperation, to determine the severity of the crime at sea into one ofth e main topics, namely the crime ofs muggling, organized crime ofil legal and immigrants and hijacked the ship sin, to differentiate the fishing disputes. The end of the same year, another sign is a "cross-strait fishing boat crew labor cooperation agreement", the establishment of the official cooperation mechanisms and strengthen cross-strait fishing boat crew protection, included in the agency authorities with responsibility to avoid bloodshed at sea happen. Although according to the present situation as a pipeline smuggling cases plunged, also reduced marine repatriation voyage, however, whether this identity ofth e ship entry to the mainland crew, breach ofco ntractual obligations behavior, can be used the the Repatriation way by the agency authority treatment, is still worth exploring. As for the smuggling by sea the mainland fishery products immigration, although our fight against crime focus, but due to both the definition of the crime of smuggling, and law enforcement officers are in the waters under the jurisdiction ofo ne's own actual within law enforcement, lack ofdire ct contact channels, often only investigation of its own people informed in a timely manner, is able to arrest the criminals ofth e other party by the cross-strait agreements platform, it seems between few and far. This paper will also propose the investigation within practical views on Kinmen and Matsu waters, contact the law enforcement authorities and the plight of proofme thods, deepen the energy ofth at portion of the mutual legal assistance agreement on judicial.

相關文獻