科學技術基本法第6條第4項修正後，擴大了「科硏採購」的範圍，參酌美國與歐盟之實 務，科學技術硏究發展因其性質特殊，確實有與一般政府採購程序加以區隔之必要。我國科技 主管機關亦因應實務需要，在符合先進科技發展國家的立法趨勢與觀點下進行法令硏修。本文 基於此次的修正條文出發，探索不同的法律解釋方式下，「科硏採購」的不同內涵，最後並結 合科硏採購實務運作面考量，以得兼法規範之完備性要求與目的性需要，思考不同管理目的下 之規範方式。

Article 6, Paragraph 4 of the Fundamental Science and Technology Act (the Fundamental Act) has been amended on December 4，2011 and the science and technology R&D acquisition has also been redefined consequently. Comparing with the USA Federal Acquisition Regulation and EU Council Directive，we could find that the science and technology R&D acquisition should have its special procedure instead of regular government procurement procedure. This article will discuss the connotation of the application of the Fundamental Act and the Government Procurement Act and try to propose a better suggestion for the legislation of the R&D acquisition.