在《說文》四大家中，桂馥《說文》學之相關研究，最為缺乏。究其因，為學者多將焦點放在桂馥《說文義證》「臚列古籍」之特色上，使桂馥之《說文》研究，產生缺乏個人創見之印象。本文旨在整理桂馥對於《說文》義例之觀念，期能從不同面向，探索桂馥《說文》學之成就。近人黃侃嘗云：「治小學不可講無條例之言、與無證據之言。」清代學者研治《說文》時，已相當注重《說文》義例之發掘，成就最大者，當屬段玉裁《說文注》，後世研究者亦夥。桂馥《說文義證》亦有申明義例者，然學者對於桂馥《說文》義例之觀念，少有相關之研究。職是，筆者嘗試研究桂馥對於《說文》義例之觀念，並輔以段玉裁之義例觀念作一比較，以見桂馥之得失。

Gui Fu "Shuo Wen" learn research, most lack. The reasons, for scholars focus onGui Fu 'set out in the classic characteristics the Gui fu of "Shuo Wen" research,produce the impression of a lack of personal Transcend.This article aims to collateGui fu from different aspects of the concept, period, "said the text" explore to Gui fu"Shuo Wen" school of achievements.The Qing scholars Research and Treatment,"Shuo Wen" has placed great emphasis on the "Shuo Wen" the concept of excavations,the biggest achievement, was undoubtedly Duan.Gui fu also affirms the concept, thethen scholars the the Gui fu "Shuo Wen" the concept of lack of research.Therefore, Itry to research the Gui fu for "Shuo Wen" concept, and is supplemented by theconcept of Duan's make a comparison, to see the pros and cons of Gui Fu.