本文探討歐洲聯盟根據彈性安全思維所制定的《派遣勞動指令》， 在立法過程中面臨的「平等」與「效率」兩難爭論以及解決途徑。研 究發現：《派遣勞動指令》是歐洲聯盟開始實踐「彈性安全」政策的 首部勞動立法，具有相當重要的政策實踐意義，但是在立法的實踐過 程中，面臨到「平等待遇原則」與「各國勞動市場發展差異」之間的 兩難時，歐洲聯盟為了促使《派遣勞動指令》能夠順利通過，因此採 取了「原則」與「例外」並存的妥協方式，賦予各會員國具有彈性認 定例外情況的處理權限，此舉對於歐洲聯盟原本想要達成的「保障派 遣勞工享有平等待遇」目標，可能造成政策落實上的影響。儘管如 此，但是歐洲聯盟在制定派遣勞動立法時所秉持強調的「平等待遇原 則」，對於臺灣未來思考如何制定派遣勞動立法，以解決派遣勞工受到 的彈性剝削問題，仍然具有重要的政策啟發價值。

This paper explore the dilemma and compromise solution between ‘equality’ and ‘efficiency’ in the legislative process of the Temporary Agency Work Directive according to the idea of flexicurity by European Union. The main finding is that European Union treated the Temporary Agency Work Directive as the first labor legislation of flexicurity policy that implied important policy meaning ,but confronted dilemma between ‘principle of equal treatment’ and ‘labor market developmental differences of Member States’ in the legislative practical process. European Union adopted a compromise solution was‘principle coexist with exceptions’which empowered Member States to identify the exceptions for the purpose of the Temporary Agency Work Directive passed, although this compromise solution may resulted in negative effect on the implementation of equal treatment principle. The heuristic meanings from European Union’s equal treatment principle affect Taiwan’s Temporary Agency Work legislation to solve the exploitation problem of agency workers in the future.