文章詳目資料

軍法專刊

  • 加入收藏
  • 暫不開放
篇名 近年來刑事實體法修正之回顧與評析一以刑法及貪污治罪條例爲中心
卷期 59:3
並列篇名 Reviews and Comments of the Amendments of Criminal Laws—Focus on Criminal Code and Anti-corruption Code
作者 蘇佩鈺
頁次 024-043
關鍵字 刑法修正貪污治罪條例修正加重竊盜罪重大違背安全駕駛罪不違背職務行 賄罪公務員財產來源不明罪Amendment of Criminal CodeAmendment of Anti-corruption CoEnhanced larcenyUnsafe drivingBribe tenderingOfficial's inconsistent increase in property or income
出刊日期 201306

中文摘要

回顧近年來刑事實體法制4個較為重要之法律修正案,並予評析。其中刑 法第321條加重竊盜罪之修正案,未達反刑事立法原則,修正值得讚許。至刑 法第185條之3重大達背安全駕駛罪加重刑度及加重結果犯之修正規定,恐刑 度有輕重失衡情形,有達罪刑相當原則,亟需將來在法務部刑法研究修正小組 逐一討論各罪時,予以通盤檢討為宜。另貪污治罪條例有關不違背職務行贿罪 入罪化,有保護之法益存在,並可導正人民思考,減少行贿情形發生。至於公 務員財產來源不明罪入罪化本即具爭議,以蕙法比例原則檢視該罪,其制訂恐 有達必要性原則及狹義比例原則,而有達蕙之虞。

英文摘要

This article reviews and tries to comments on the four main amendments of criminal laws. Among them, the amendment of article 321 of Criminal Codes followed the principle of criminal legislation which is worthy of praise. The amendment of article 185-3 (unsafe driving) cumulating the penalty and effect might be against the rule of proportion, which would be appropriate for the Criminal Codes Research and Amending team of Justice Ministry to review and discuss among all. In addition, the penalization of the crime of official's inconsistent increase in property or income in Anti-corruption Codes benefits the protected welfare and helps to correct deviating thoughts and to decrease bribery. As for the controversial amendment of official's inconsistent increase in property or income, it might be against the rule of necessity and proportion under the Constitutional examination of proportion principle and thus, unconstitutional.

相關文獻