本研究探討性騷擾受害女性的因應與處理，如何導致衍生性衝擊，以瞭解性騷擾作為父權壓迫，如 何透過意識型態及社會場域之運作，持續對受害女性進行壓迫與消音。本研究深度訪談九位經歷過 性騷擾事件之女性，發現受訪女性的性騷擾樣態及因應方式，相當多元，但多受制於父權的社會場 域，其因應及處理結果通常對受害女性造成衍生性傷害，如：對命名性騷擾的猶豫、對揭露事件的 焦應、應對性騷擾的自責、面質騷擾者的反挫、申訴歷程的機構性虐待，及人際關係的破損與疏離 等衍生性傷害。據此，本研究認為，父權場域的性別意識型態，經常透過下列機制，對性騷擾受害 女性造成多重「雙綁」困境：受害女性符合父權文化的陰柔因應，卻通常導致對自我的質疑與責備； 受害女性展現主體的面質與申訴，卻經常引發騷擾者的惡意反制、社會網络的背棄及機構性的虐待； 受害女性掙扎存活及復原的心理資源，卻經常面臨人際關係受創的折損。然而，本研究亦發現，父 權體制對性騷擾受害女性的「消音」歷程，並非滴水不漏，部分受訪女性仍採面質及申訴等積極的 因應性騷擾事件。此外，受害女性對衍生性衝擊的覺察與批判，似乎辯證性地提供女性顛覆父權宰 制的契機。

While most sexual harassment literature in Taiwan focus on the primary impacts of sexual harassment incident, this study examines nine women survivors’ secondary harm resulting from coping with sexual harassment. This study found that survivors experienced various types of sexual harassment and engaged in various coping styles. Nevertheless, due to the patriarchal culture, their coping of sexual harassment often resulted into secondary harms, such as disclosure anxiety, self-blame for confusion, backlash from confronting the harasser, institutional abuse in the complaint process, as well as destruction and isolation in social relationship. Although the main findings support radical feminist contention of sexual harassment as patriarchal oppression on women, this paper also noticed that women’s discourse on the secondary harm from sexual harassment reveals their resentment with and resistance to sexism in Taiwan , which might represent a possible subversion to patriarchal oppression.