本文旨在分析雲格爾在著述裡對實體類比(analogia entis)的批 評，並觀照米爾班為實體類比作出的辯護，對他們迥異的進路作 出整理、對照。雲格爾認為實體類比的上帝「太遙遠」，米爾班 則強調當中上帝那「難以形容的親和關係」。米爾班承認這親和 關係基於的「分有」，是一個不能想像的中間詞。接著，本文嘗 試提出「形相」（form/edos)作為爭論雙方和解的缺環，論述資源 為提芬妮對科學論述的討論，以及奥古斯丁對「從無創造」的思 考。

This article aims to compile and contrast the different approaches adopted by Eberhard Jungel and John Milbank on analogia entis, by analyzing and comparing their respective critiques and defenses. While Jungel opined that the God is “too far away” in this theory, Milbank emphasized the “relations of ineffable affinity” of God in it. Milbank claimed that the “Participation” which grounds this affinity is an unimaginable middle-term. This article continues to propose use of the terms “form/eiJos” as a missing connection to reconcile these two positions, drawing articulation resources from the discussion of Daniel Tiffany on science discourses, and the thought of St. Augustine on creatio ex nihilo.