本研究在探討臺中市國小籃球選手知覺教練領導行爲與團隊凝聚力上是否有差異。結果如下：一、臺中市國小籃球選手知覺教練領導行爲分析結果，籃球選手知覺教練領導行爲依序爲訓練與指導行爲、關懷行爲、獎勵行爲、民主行爲、權威行爲。ニ、在性別方面，男生選手感受到較多的「訓練與指導」、「民主行爲」及「關懷行爲」；在毎週訓練時間方面，毎週訓練時 間愈長的選手對於教練領導行爲有較高的感受力；在年級方面，就讀年級愈高愈能感受教練的 「訓練與指導」、「民主行爲」及「關懷行爲」：在與教練相處年數方面，與教練相處年數愈久的選手對於教練的「訓練與指導」及「獎勵行爲」有較高的感受力；在學校類型方面，中型學校的選手感受到教練較多的「訓練與指導」、「民主行爲」、「關懷行爲」及「獎勵行爲」》三、 臺中市國小籃球選手團隊凝聚カ部分，依序爲團隊適應、團隊合作、人際吸引、人際親和。四、在性別方面，男生選手之人際親和力較高；在毎週訓練時間方面，每週訓練時間愈長的選手其團隊凝聚カ愈強；在年級方面，就讀年級愈高其團隊凝聚カ愈強；在與教練相處年數方面，選手的團隊凝聚カ並不會因與教練相處年數不同而有顯著差異；在學校類型方面，中大型學校之選手具有較強的團隊凝聚カ》五、教練領導行爲中，「訓練與指導」、「民主行為」、「關懷行爲」 及「獎勵行爲」與團隊凝聚カ有顯著正相關，其中以「關懷行爲」與團隊凝聚カ相關性最高；而｢權威行爲」與團隊凝聚カ則無顯著相關。六、教練領導行爲中，關懷、訓練與指導及獎勵行爲能有效預測整體團隊凝聚カ；訓練與指導及民主行爲能有效預測團隊合作；關懷及訓練與指導行爲能有效預測人際親和；關懷及訓練與指導行爲能有效預測團隊適應；關懷、訓練與指導及獎勵行為能有效預測人際吸引。

The purposes of this study are to research the relation between the leader behavior of basketball coaches and team cohesion in Taichung elementary school. The results were as follows: l.On perceiving coaches，leader behavior, the average score in order is training and guiding behavior, concern behavior, reward behavior, democratic behavior and authoritative behavior. 2. In the gender aspect, male players feel more “training and guiding behavior’’，“democratic behavior” and “concern behavior”. In the training time aspect, players feel more about coaches’ leading behavior when they take longer training time. In the grade aspect, players who study in the higher grades feel more “training and guiding behavior’’，“democratic behavior” and “concern behavior”. In the time being together with coach aspect, players who are being together with coach longer feel more “training and guiding behavior” and “reward behavior”. In the school type aspect, players who study in the medium school feel more “training and guiding behavior”，“democratic behavior”，“concern behavior” and “reward behavior”； 3. On perceiving team cohesion, the average score in order is team adaptation, team cooperation, interpersonal attraction, and interpersonal compatible.4. In the gender aspect, male players have higher score in interpersonal compatible. In the training time aspect, players have higher score in team cohesion when they take longer training time. In the grade aspect, players have higher score in team cohesion when their grade are higher. In the time being together with coach aspect, players’ team cohesion have no difference. In the school type aspect, players who study in the medium or large school have higher score in team cohesion ; 5. In the coaches’ leader behaviors, training and guiding behavior, democratic behavior, concern behavior and reward behavior are positively and significantly related to team cohesion, and concern behavior is the highest related to team cohesion. The authoritative behavior is not significantly related to team cohesion; and 6. In the coaches’ leader behaviors, “concern behavior’’，“training and guiding behavior” and “reward behavior” can predict team cohesion effectively, “training and guiding behavior” and “democratic behavior” can predict team cooperation effectively, “concern behavior” and “training and guiding behavior” can predict interpersonal compatible effectively, “concern behavior” and “training and guiding behavior” can predict team adaptation effectively, “concern behavior”，“training and guiding behavior” and “reward behavior” can predict interpersonal attraction effectively.