詹信（Robert Jenson)致力提倡敘事神學式的三一論，並稱它為「修正」的形而上學，但這構想引來學者們質疑他是否妥善處理上帝、時間與受造之間的關係。本文指出詹信問題的核心在於他如何理解敘事的本質。本文透過雲格爾（Eberhard Jungel) 與詹信如何詮釋巴特，指出詹信的問題在於忽視了三一作為上 帝自我啟示事件，其中所蘊含溝通言說行動的複雜現象。雲格爾有關三ー敘事（作為言說-行動）的解說，提出了其中類比性、溝通性及詮釋性層面的重要性，他的理解能提供解決詹信敘事三ー神學問題的ー些方向。

Robert Jenson promotes a narrative theology of the Trinity which he calls “revisionary” metaphysics. But, it raises concerns about the proper relation between God, time, and creation. The author argues that the problem is in Jenson，s understanding of the nature of narrative. A comparison of Eberhard Jungel and Jenson，s theology of the Trinity through their interpretation of Barth finds that Jenson overlooks the communicative complexity of the event of God，s selfrevelation. Jungel，s understanding of analogical, communicative, and hermeneutical dimensions of the Triune narrative (i.e., as word-event) shows a direction in which we may revise Jenson，s theological project