目的：本研究的目的在探討全身性振動(whole body vibration, WBV)介入對阻力運動中與恢復期之能量消耗是否有顯著之影響。方法：本研究以8名健康男性大學生為實驗受試者。實驗受試者在實驗前皆接受最大肌力 (one-repetition-maximum,1RM)測驗，隨後8名實驗受試者以重複量數與對抗平衡次序之設計分配至振動+阻力運動實驗處理(REV)與阻カ運動實驗處理(RE)。REV實驗處理之受試者在進行阻力運動時(3組;75%1RM強度進行10次反覆；2個動作：屈膝半蹲與直立划船；每組休息時間為2分鐘），同時接受WBV (頻率：30Hz ；振幅：1.5mm)，RE實驗處理則僅進行阻力運動。在阻力運動中和運動後恢復期（120分鐘）皆全程測量實驗受試者的攝氧量(oxygen consumption, VO2)、心跳率(heart rate, HR)、換氣量(ventilation volume, VE)和呼吸交換率 (respiratory exchange ratio, RER)。本研究以相依樣本ニ因子變異數分析(ANOVA) 分析是否有顯著差異，顯著水準a訂為.05。結果：REV實驗處理之VO2在運動中（17.60±1.44 vs. 15.44±2.02 ml/kg/min)與恢復期之 0-30 分鐘(7.61±0.494 vs. 6.36±0.65 ml/kg/min)及 30-60 分鐘(5.76±0.54 vs. 5.10±0.30 ml/kg/min)顯著高於 RE 實驗處理。此外，在阻力運動恢復期，REV實驗處理之RER在0-30分鐘(0.79土 0.03 vs. 0.84±0.03)及 30-60 分鐘(0.73±0.04 vs. 0.79±0.03)顯著低於 RE 實驗處理。結論：本研究結果發現WBV介入阻力運動會顯著提升運動者在運動中與運動後恢復期之能量消耗，此外，在運動後恢復期亦會提升脂肪在能量消耗來源上的比例。

Purpose: The purposes of this research were to examine the effect of whole body vibration (WBV) with resistance exercise (RE) on energy expenditure during exercise and recovery periods. Methods: Eight male college students participated in this study. Subjects perform a one repetition maximum (1RM) test and two treatments in a counter balanced order: WBV+RE (REV) and RE (RE). REV treatment performed WBV (amplitude: 1.5 mm, frequency: 30 Hz) with RE (2 exercises: half squat and upright rowing, 3 sets of 10 repetition at 75% of 1RM) and RE treatment only performed RE. The oxygen consumption (VO2), heart rate (HR), ventilation volume (VE) and respiratory exchange ratio (RER) were measured during exercise and recovery periods (0-120 min post to RE). Statistical analysis of two-way analysis of variance with repeated measures is applied. Statistical significance is set at a = .05. Results: The VO2 of REV were significantly higher than that of RE during exercise (17.60±1.44 vs. 15.44±2.02 ml/kg/min )and recovery periods (R30: 7.61±0.494 vs. 6.36±0.65 ml/kg/min; R60: 5.76±0.54 vs. 5.10±0.30 ml/kg/min). In addition, The RER of REV was significantly lower than that of RE during recovery period (R30: 0.79±0.03 vs. 0.84±0.03; R60: 0.73±0.04 vs. 0.79±0.03). Conclusion: The results of the present study indicated WBV with RE could significantly elevate the energy expenditure during exercise and recovery periods. In addition, WBV with RE could result in more fat oxidation during recovery period.