文章詳目資料

高大法學論叢

  • 加入收藏
  • 下載文章
篇名 由美國立法經驗探討促進兒科試驗暨兒科用藥研究之合理措施
卷期 9:1
並列篇名 To Study the Reasonable Measures of Improving Pediatric Clinical Trials and Drug Research from the U.S. Legislation Experience
作者 陳文吟
頁次 107-166
關鍵字 專利權兒科臨床試驗兒科研究兒科評估資料專屬權市場專屬權罕見疾病孤兒藥法Patent RightsPediatric Clinical TrialsPediatric StudyPediatric AssessmentData ExclusivityMarketing ExclusivityRare DiseasesOrphan Drug Act
出刊日期 201309

中文摘要

西元1968年Harry Shirkey醫生著文,謂兒童是醫療上的孤兒,至今已45年,兒童依舊是醫療上的孤兒。主要原因爲兒科用藥市場有限、兒科臨床試験的困難,藥廠在評估損益後,多選擇放棄兒科市場,不從事兒科臨床試験。專利權利的賦予,已公認係促進硏發、提升產業科技與改善人類生活和健康的必要措施;然而,專利制度未必能克盡其功。
美國FDA先後制定BPCA及PREA,一則以市場專屬權鼓勵藥廠進行兒科研究,另一則以強制手段令藥廠於申請上市時檢附兒科評估、及以書面通知令藥廠就已上市薬品從事兒科評估。然而,依BPCA進行研究的薬品未必爲兒童所需要;而市場專屬權卻使大眾須繼續負擔較貴的醫藥費用。是以,本文不建議採行BPCA之市場專屬權。PREA雖較具強制效果,對於潜在有助於、但仍未廣泛使用於兒科病患的已上市薬品或非專利藥品,仍無強制力或誘因促使 藥廠進行兒科研究。
鑑於美國立法的優點及缺失,以及鼓勵硏發新的兒科用藥之不易,本文建議以下列方式鼓勵兒科研究與兒科用藥的硏發:①於藥事法中明定新藥之取得上市許可應檢附兒科研究資料;倘原藥廠因正當事由無法從事兒科研究,食管局得依職權委託或依申請由第三人進行研究。②以專利制度之用途發明專利,鼓勵藥廠就已上市藥品及非專利藥品従事硏發兒科用藥之新用途,提升兒科病患之醫療品質。

英文摘要

In 1968, Dr. Harry Shirkey pointed out Children are therapeutic orphans. As to the study of approved drugs, only 25% to 30% of them included pediatric data that could be approved to indicate children’s doses, safety and efficacy on the labels. Other than that, physicians prescribe off-label drugs to children. Lack of doses and safety information causes our children exposed to severe adverse effects and sometimes receive inefficient treatment. Children are different from adults, not on the height or weight, but on the bodies, such as drug metabolism, brain development, immunological systems and organ systems. To prescribe adult drugs to children without pediatric clinical trial information is risky. U.S. Congress enacted pediatric related legislation such as PBCA and PREA, the former encourages pharmaceutical companies to conduct pediatric study by offering six-month marketing exclusivity, and the latter forces pharmaceutical companies to conduct pediatric assessment. FDA marketing exclusivity caused many adult patients great burden for medical expenses, but created little Deneiits to children.
In our country, there isn’t any law relating to pediatric medication. Having studied American legislation, the author concluded that PBCA- like legislation should not be recommended, but, suggested the following measures to improve our pediatric drugs: 1. to adopt PREA-like legislation, forcing company to conduct pediatric study; 2. to encourage pediatric drug use invention by providing new use invention patents.

相關文獻