邇來由於媒體對軍法裁判品質及修法前、後刑事政策之誤解，致使人民對軍法之信任感喪失，進而影響軍法整體形象甚鉅；有鑑於此，本文以現行軍法體制運行所依據之刑事政策，藉以顛覆以往人民沿襲對傳統軍法之看法；因此，以中國大陸「嚴打」刑事政策為對照，匡正社會對軍法從重、嚴刑峻罰之舊觀感。同時，先後透過程序及實體面之軍法刑事政策，說明我軍法自 1999 年後，有別於中國大陸之先進立法、保障人權、國際化及本土化之法治國特色，期能夠喚起國人對我軍法有新風貌的認識及介紹，彰顯本文所戮力推廣之核心價值。
1999 年 10 月隨著司法院大法官會議解釋第 436 號解釋的影響，奠定現行軍事審判制度新的里程碑，此為程序面革新之序曲；就實體面，新《陸海空軍刑法》亦在法治國理念下於 2001 年 9 月經立法院三讀通過，以保障軍中人權，順應民主潮流而徹底地改頭換面，以刑事政策之角度而言，有著比以往甚至比刑法更具非凡意義之立法例；因此，本文先以軍人是穿著軍服的公民、針對軍人所設的軍事審判之特別訴訟程序、軍法審級利益的改變，從程序面（《軍事審判法》）及實體面（《陸海空軍刑法》）來論述現行軍法刑事政策，有別於大陸「嚴打」政策，係指依法從重、從快、嚴厲打擊重大刑事犯罪活動，現行《軍刑法》之刑事政策講求的是「平時從寬、戰時從嚴；危害從輕、實害從重」，也就是由傳統「速審速決」之觀念轉換為「妥審速結」之政策，以期：一、軍事刑事法網嚴密；二、軍事刑法責任嚴格；三、戰時軍事刑罰嚴厲，以達法治國軍事刑事法－應嚴當嚴之立法意旨。

Recently, the quality of military justice and amending the law before and after due to media's misunderstanding, caused people to lose trust of the military justice, thereby affecting the overall military image is very huge. In view of this, this paper is based on the current running military regime is the criminal policy to subversion the view of the past that people think of traditional military law. Therefore, Mainland China by the "Strike Hard" criminal policy as contraposition, to subvert the past traditional view of military justice that people followed. At the same time, through military criminal policy of substantive military law and procedural military law, That martial law, since 1999, unlike Mainland China, different advanced legislation, protection of human rights, international and localization characteristics of the rule of law and hope to raise public awareness of a new style of military and introduction and to try my best to promote the core values in this paper.