為了研究上的方便，學者經常把宋代的《詩經》學大分為疑〈序〉、尊〈序〉、 兩派，前者以朱熹的《詩集傳》最受矚目，後者則以呂祖謙的《呂氏家塾讀詩記》 與嚴粲的《詩緝》獲得的評價最高。《四庫全書總目》一方面認為《詩緝》的撰 述以《讀詩記》為主，一方面又以為整個宋代《詩經》學以呂、嚴二書最為出色， 另有清儒直指《詩緝》為宋人說《詩》第一者。
本文透過比較分析的方法，說明《呂氏家塾讀詩記》與《詩緝》之間的異同 性，並且解釋兩者既尊重《詩經》漢學又高抬朱熹《詩》解的編纂用心與學術意 義，最後再根據《呂氏家塾讀詩記》與嚴粲的《詩緝》的細部表現差異，以論斷 「南宋尊〈序〉派誰第一」的相關問題，指出《詩緝》因為體例較為完整，學術 論見較多，以此而使其整體表現稍優於《讀詩記》。

For convenience of research, scholars often differentiate the Book of Songs studies in The Song Dynasty between “to doubt the Preface to the Book of Songs” and “ to value the Preface to the Book of Songs.” - the best-known works in the former is Zhu Xi’s Shi JiZhuan, while the latter are Lu Zuqian’s Lushi jiashu dushiji and Yan Can’s ShiQi. The Siku Quanshu Zongmu viewed ShiQi as a follower of Lushi jiashu dushiji, and pointed out that Lu Zuqian’s and Yan Can’s books are the best in the Song Dynasty. This paper 1) compares and analyzes the differences and similarities between Lushi jiashu dushiji and ShiQi, 2) interprets the impact that they had on the study of the Book of Songs, and 3) discusses the question of “who is the best scholar of the Book of Songs in the Southern Song Dynasty.”