文章詳目資料

教育政策論壇 TSSCI

  • 加入收藏
  • 下載文章
篇名 台灣與日本高等教育國際人才培育之比較分析
卷期 17:3
並列篇名 A Comparative Analysis of International Talent Training in Higher Education between Taiwan and Japan
作者 桂田愛黃文三沈碩彬
頁次 029-061
關鍵字 日本台灣高等教育國際人才培育JapanTaiwanhigher educationinternational personnel trainingTSSCI
出刊日期 201408
DOI 10.3966/156082982014081703002

中文摘要

教育是百年樹人的大業,隨著時代背景的推移,為求能提升國家的競爭力、因應社會廣大民眾的需求,以及個人潛能的發展,均須時時有所創新及改革。尤其,大學是孕育國家發展人才的搖籃,兼具有研究高深學術、學習專門知能及推廣服務之重責大任。是以,高等教育的發展係關乎與世界各國競賽及頭角崢嶸的磐石。再者,高等教育是培育專門人才之搖籃,使大學生能夠涵養人文學識、豐富專業知能、擴充國際視野,而能與各國競爭,故高等教育之改革為各國國家發展的必然趨勢。台灣與日本就地理位置、歷史脈絡、學制沿革、教育方式等常有著異曲同工之妙,其高等教育改革的措施亦有諸多可比較之處。本文針對近年來台、日兩國的高等教育國際人才培育加以比較,並提出本文之結論,藉供高等教育研究者、國家行政與教育單位等之參考。

英文摘要

Education is one of the indispensible elements for the development of a country. To promote the whole competition of a country, to satisfy the demand of human beings, and to stimulate individual potential intelligence, education of a country should progress constantly in accordance with the change of the current trends. Higher education, a cradle of incubating professional people, plays an essential role in research and development, academic knowledge, and extensive educational service in the overwhelming development of a country. Nevertheless, there are some disadvantages in the current higher education. In order to provide college students with more professional knowledge and skills, and to develop their authentic knowledge and global competition, higher education policies and measures have to be amended in accordance with the changes of the society. In this paper, the reader will be shown the comparisons and contracts between the higher education reforms of Taiwan, Republic of China, and Japan.Due to the similar geographical location, development of history and educational systems and approaches, it is worth investigating the higher education reforms and strategies of Taiwan and Japan. There are several discussions in the independence of the education strategies, teaching evaluation and research, development of international and professional people among universities with high ranks in Taiwan and Japan. The relative results of the paper will be positive references for governments, education administrative institutes and academic researchers.

相關文獻