江聲、王鳴盛為乾嘉時期吳派代表之學者，二家於經學上咸以《尚書》名家，其治經皆以鄭學為宗，為清代中葉《古文尚書》學之代表。然而細究二家著作，對鄭《注》之輯佚，乃至於觀念及詮釋上，或有不同之處。本文認為，二家在治經觀念之歧異，影響了各自著作之面貌，故雖同為鄭學，呈現之內容亦有差別。本文所作，即以《尚書集注音疏》、《尚書後案》所輯之鄭《注》為研究對象，以見二家輯佚內容、方法、觀念之異同，以期作為日後研究江、王《尚書》學之基礎。

Scholars Jiang Sheng and Wang Ming-Sheng are representative of the Wu School during the reigns of emperors Qianlong and Jiaqing. When studying the Book of Documents they both advocate the Old Text version and follow Zheng Xuan’s interpretation. However, this study finds that their works demonstrate separate concepts for compiling and interpreting Zheng’s annotations and infers that the two scholars have different attitudes that influence their works. By comparing the contents, methods, and concepts of their compilations of Zheng’s annotations on the Book of Documents with Collected Annotations and Pronunciation Annotations * Ph.D Student, Department of Chinese Literature, Shih Hsin University. and Commentary on the Book of Documents, this study provides reference for future research on Jiang’s and Wang’s interpretations of the Book of Documents.Scholars Jiang Sheng and Wang Ming-Sheng are representative of the Wu School during the reigns of emperors Qianlong and Jiaqing. When studying the Book of Documents they both advocate the Old Text version and follow Zheng Xuan’s interpretation. However, this study finds that their works demonstrate separate concepts for compiling and interpreting Zheng’s annotations and infers that the two scholars have different attitudes that influence their works. By comparing the contents, methods, and concepts of their compilations of Zheng’s annotations on the Book of Documents with Collected Annotations and Pronunciation Annotations * Ph.D Student, Department of Chinese Literature, Shih Hsin University. and Commentary on the Book of Documents, this study provides reference for future research on Jiang’s and Wang’s interpretations of the Book of Documents.