本研究結合決策實驗室分析法(DEMATEL)與網路層級分析法(ANP)應在研究機構研發計畫提案評選。首先以決策實驗室分析法找出需求、技術與效益三個構面之間相依與回饋性，以及相互連結的因果關係。另，以網路層級分析法(Analytic Network Process, ANP)來評估準則之間可能存有的相互依存和回饋問題以及計算評選準則的權重。本文並針對紡織所兩個關鍵計畫：「產業用紡織品研究與開發四年計畫」包括十個子計劃提案，與「機能性紡織產業關鍵技術研發四年計畫」包括八個子計畫提案進行評選。本研究邀請五位專家以權重評分法進行評選，分別淘汰排序較落後的子計畫提案。另，本研究對於某些得分中等的計畫提案在某些評選準則得分較低者，可提供進一步改善的空間與建議。

A combination of methods, DEMATEL (Decision Making Trial andEvaluation Laboratory) and ANP (Analytic Network Process), is employed to theR&D project selection in a research institute. DEMATEL was first used to find thedependence and feedback, and a casual-effect diagram among three aspects, i.e.needs, technology, and benefit. ANP was then used to determine different weightof criteria in each aspect. To verify the feasibility, two key technology R&Dprograms from Taiwan Textile Research Institute (TTRI), “Technical TextilesR&D Program” and “Functional Textiles R&D Program”, which consist of ten andeight projects respectively, were evaluated by five technical experts to give theirsubjective score on each criterion of the projects. The lower ranking projects were rejected based on the score weighting method. However, some projects withintermediate scores could be improved or revised by looking into their individualperformance scores of each criterion.