本文主要討論明末趙均覆宋陳玉父本《玉臺新詠》之後，清代出現的幾種趙本系統的校、注、考異本，主要有：趙均覆宋本、二馮（馮舒、馮班）校本、吳兆宜注、程琰刪本、《四庫全書》本、徐乃昌刻本。經過研究，這幾種版本均存在問題，主要是：一、現存傳世的趙氏覆宋本有初刻初印和修板重印及補板後印的區別，根據我們大致的調查，起碼有可分為三種類型印本。初刻本與補修本的文字有不同。故此我們使用趙氏覆宋本時，必須要慎重，並有所交待。二、二馮校本校語中所提的宋本，往往與趙氏本合，而非其所抄的宋陳玉父本。三、《四庫全書》本，其底本亦為趙氏覆宋本，而非紀昀所說宋陳玉父本。又，現今傳世的文淵閣和文津閣本，二本歧異甚多，使用時必須有區別。四、吳兆宜注本有初注和後注區別。初注本的底本用明通行本，後注本則據趙氏本，故今所見之後注本中往往留有明本的特徵。又，吳本未曾刊刻，後程琰刪補合吳本一起刊刻，但程氏對吳本作了刪節，故吳本原有體例已不甚明。五、徐乃昌影刻趙本，底本系趙均覆宋本的第二次印本，即初刻修字印本，與現在所見藏於北京大學圖書館的徐乃昌舊藏本不同。北京大學圖書館所藏徐乃昌舊藏本系趙均覆宋本的第三次印本，即補板後印本。學術界往往誤以為此本即徐乃昌刻本的底本，至於徐乃昌刻本出現與此本不同的地方，學術界誤判為徐乃昌校刻所致。其實徐乃昌刻本所據底本並非他的這個藏本，而是全據趙均覆宋本的第二次印本影刻，徐氏對底本沒有作校改。

The article studies the editions in Zhao Jun's editing system of the NewSongs from the Jade Terrace. The system starts with the edition that Ming DynastyZhao Jun reprints from Song Dynasty Chen Yu-Fu's edition. Many editions ofthis system are published in the Qing Dynasty: Zhao Jun's reprint edition, Fengbrothers’ proofread edition, Wu Zhao-Yi's annotated edition, Cheng Yan's abridgededition, the Complete Library of the Four Treasuries edition, and Xu Nai-Chang'swoodblock print edition. All these editions have problems, as listed below:1. There are three versions of Zhao Jun's reprint edition: the first version; the secondversion, printed after repair of the first version's printing plate; and the thirdedition, reprinted after supplement to the second version's printing plate. It isnecessary to clarify and mention which version is used when using them.2. The “Song edition” mentioned in the proofread edition of the Feng Brothers—Feng Shu and Feng Ban—does not refer to the edition they copy from: the SongDynasty Chen Yu-Fu's edition, but Zhao Jun's reprint edition.3. The original edition of the Complete Library of the Four Treasuries edition isalso Zhao Jun's edition, not Chen Yu-Fu's edition as Ji Yun says. There are a lotof differences between the Wen-Yuan Chamber edition and the Wen-Jin Chamberedition, so which one of the two editions is being used should be specified.4. Wu Zhao-Yi's annotated edition includes two versions. The book that Wuannotates later is Zhao Jun's reprint edition while the one that Wu first annotatesis the edition most common in the Ming Dynasty, so the later one has some ofMing common edition's features. Wu's annotated edition has never been printed.Cheng Yan abridges it before compiling it into his abridged edition, so its originalappearance can never be seen now.5. Xu Nai-Chang's woodblock print edition is based on the second version of Zhao'sedition, while the book that Xu has collected and the Peking University Librarycollects now is the third version of Zhao's edition. However, it is often mistakenlythought in Chinese academic circles that Zhao's second version is the basis ofXu's woodblock print edition, and that the differences between Zhao's secondversion and Xu's woodblock print edition are Xu's mistakes when he reprints thebook. Xu does not modify the content of Zhao's second version when making thewoodblock print edition from it.