研究目的在建構大專校院運動代表隊績效評估指標。透過問卷調查方式於2012年1月10日至2月10日，針對大專運動運動代表隊管理者、運動管理、體育政策專家等8人做調查，並採用德爾菲法與模糊層級分析法，建構大專校院運動代表隊績效評估指標。結果顯示，一、大專校院運動代表隊績效評估指標共分成投入與產出兩個層面，本研究建構投入與產出兩大層面，共28項指標，其中在投入層面部分包括「運動代表隊數目」、「經費預算」、「人力資源」、「場地與設備」、「學校人數」與「時間」等6項次層面；在產出層面則包括「獎牌與名次」、「獎金」與「名譽獎勵」等3項次層面。二、透過模糊層級分析結果，其投入層面權重以「場地與設備」最高，產出層面權重則以「獎牌與名次」最高；在層級內串聯後權重排名部分，投入層面中，以「專任運動教練人數」最高；產出層面中，則以「大運會金牌總數」最高。本文於結論部分提出大專校院要提升運動代表隊之績效，先要管控學校「場地與設備」層面的投入，再增加「獎牌與名次」層面的產出，另外，在大專校院運動代表隊績效評估指標中，以「專任運動教練人數」在投入層面中模糊權重值最高，在產出層面以「大運會金牌總數」模糊權重值最高，因此控制「專任運動教練人數」與擬定「奪金計劃」可達到良好的績效，學校之間的個別特殊差異因素則不在本研究探討範圍。

Purpose: This study is aiming to construct the performance evaluation indicators of university’s sports teams. Methods: A questionnaire was administered to eight experts from January 10 to February 10, 2012, which included the managers of college sports teams, experts of sports management and experts of sports policy. The Delphi and fuzzy AHP methods had been used to develop the performance evaluation indicators. Results: The results were categorized as input and output indicators. The input level included six dimensions, “sports team” “budgets” “human resources” “stadium and equipment” “population of the university” and “time”. The output levels were included three dimensions “medals and ranking” “bonus” and “honorary award”. The Delphi and fuzzy AHP methods determined 28 indicators, include the types of sport, number of teams, and the total number of athletes, etc. The highest fuzzy weights were “Full-time sports coaches” and “The amount of medals”. Conclusion: This study suggested that the university sports teams were honor-oriented. The main input and output indicators for the performance evaluation of the university sports team are the number of full-time sports coaches and the total amount of gold medals respectively. Since the huge amount of facility maintenance fees, the institutions should concentrated on effective fund management. The individual factors differences between universities did not considered in this study.