本研究旨在編製適用於評量高中職學生社會行為的工具。「高中職學生社會行為評量系統」包含教師、家長及學生評量表，三種評量表（各110題）內容均包括兩部分：社會能力量表（48題）及問題行為量表（62題）。本研究主要在發展社會能力量表，包括自我控制（自主行為、情緒管理）、人際互動（人際關係、溝通表達及合作同理）及學習行為（學習習慣、學習表現）等三向度七個分量表，作答方式以Likert式五點量表。效度證據之結果如下：(1)在內容上的證據顯示獲得文獻支持及專家的肯定；(2)在信度上，教師、家長及學生評量表之社會能力量表的內部一致性係數良好，間隔四週重測信度結果也顯示量表的穩定性係數尚可，三種評量表之社會能力量表的評量者間一致性則出現低度至中度相關；(3)在效標關聯上的證據顯示教師及家長評量表之社會能力量表與「行為情緒評量表」，以及學生評量表之社會能力量表與「貝克兒童及青少年量表第二版」的相關皆達顯著；(4)區辨性證據顯示教師評量表之社會能力量表可以有效區別情障個案與一般學生；(5)構念的內部結構之證據顯示驗證性因素分析結果發現教師、家長及學生評量表之「社會能力量表」均與原先構念的結構相符。最後，以高中職教師607人、家長1,168人及學生1,246人分別建立全國常模。

The purposes of this study were 1) to develop a social behavior assessment system for adolescent - social competence scale; and 2) to evaluate the reliability and validity of this proposed scale. The social behavior assessment system for adolescent comprised three scales: the teacher rating scale (TRS), parent rating scale (PRS), and self-report scale (SRS). TRS, PRS, and SRS all included 110 items in two scales: social competence scale (SCS) and problem behavior scale (PBS). The social competence scale consisted of 48 items divided into seven subscales for measuring three theoretical dimensions: self-control, interpersonal interaction, and academic behavior. The development of social competence scale yielded the following results regarding validity: 1) evidence based on test content was established and supported by exploring literature and expert validity; 2) TRS-SCS, PRS-SCS, and SRS-SCS all have high internal consistency reliability and 4-week-interval re-test reliability. Besides, the inter-rater reliability between teachers, parents and students were lower to moderate; 3) the concurrent criterion related evidence of the TRS-SCS and PRS-SCS to the behavioral and emotional rating scale and the SRS-SCS to the Beck youth inventories were all significant; 4) the discriminant evidence of TRS-SCS was found to be considerably satisfactory in discriminating children with emotional and behavioral problems from those without; 5) evidence based on internal structure indicates that the results of confirmatory factory analysis were found considerably satisfactory in TRS-SCS, PRS-SCS, and SRS-SCS. In general, the reliability and validity of the study were satisfactory. Finally, the percentile rank and t-score norms were developed for 607 subjects in TRS-SCS, 1,168 subjects in PRS-SCS and 1,246 subjects in SRS-SCS.