文章詳目資料

醒吾學報

  • 加入收藏
  • 下載文章
篇名 同性戀服役的思辯-以美軍「不問、不說」政策之變革為例
卷期 51
並列篇名 The speculative thinking and debate of homosexual service-The evolution of the policy of " don't ask, don't tell " in U.S. as an example
作者 吳岳峰劉育偉
頁次 001-020
關鍵字 不問不說服役性傾向同性戀don't askdon't tellmilitary servicesexual orientationhomosexual
出刊日期 201501

中文摘要

本文研究工具係以法律文獻探討為主。考量美軍長期以募兵制度為政策,復因戰爭 經驗豐富,役政制度受到戰爭洗禮之粹鍊而愈趨成熟,故其對於同性戀在軍中服役之經 驗及民主開放程度,相較於其他國家,極富研究參考價值。 而「不問、不說」政策,是美軍1994 年至2010 年間對待軍隊內同性戀者的政策。 依據美國國家統計局在2011 年的報告,估計美軍2004 年至2009 年間約花費近1.93 億 美元來執行此政策,而平均每位成員的成本約為5 萬2,800 美元,足見國家對於此政策 之投入耗費相當大的成本。因此,在2010 年,美國總統即簽署廢除「不問,不說」這 項持續17 年禁止男同性戀和女同性戀服役成員在軍中公開性傾向的政策,這對於保守 的美國部隊而言,是人權保障上相當大的突破及打破長久軍中對同性戀歧視之禁錮;他 山之石可以攻錯,我國亦面臨兵役政策之轉型,矧相對地,我國兵役相關法規,雖對同 性戀者服役之規範付之厥如,但仍可藉由探討美國廢除「不問、不說」政策的經驗,以 作為「未來」或「假設未來」我國面臨同性戀兵役政策時,如何取捨或應處之參考;同 時,或亦可作為如何革新軍中人權保障思酌之方向。

英文摘要

This article is based on research tools to explore the legal literature. US-based long-term considerations to recruiting. Because the rich American experience of war, military service system by Nazi war chains and mature. Therefore, the degree of democratic experience and open homosexuality in the military service, and in comparison to other countries, very valuable reference. "Do not ask, do not tell" policy, the US military from 1994 to 2010 between the military treats gay policies. In 2011, according to US statistics report, between 2004 to 2009 of nearly $ 193 million spending about to perform this policy. Moreover, the average cost of each member of the approximately $ 50,000 $ 2,800, which shows the country to put this policy of consuming considerable cost. Thus, in 2010, the US President signed the repeal "Do not ask, do not tell" policy that continued for 17 years to prohibit gay men and lesbians serving. For the conservative American troops is concerned, is the protection of human rights is quite a big breakthrough. He can attack the wrong stone hills. China is also facing a transition of military policy. Although our service specification for homosexuals is almost zero, but can still be experienced to repeal the policy as "future" or "hypothesis Future" gay military policy when faced with how to reform the military thinking in the direction of human rights protection.

相關文獻