性騷擾防治法規範了性騷擾防治委員會的任務，最大差異在於「性騷擾爭議案件之調查與 調解」，跳脫了僅有諮詢建議的角色；外部委員因其專業知能或經驗進入委員會，如何看待自 己的角色及專業任務；對於規範的應有作為，與在不同地區的實際作為存在的差異，又是如何 解讀與面對。本文針對7 個縣市14 位性騷擾防治委員會的外部委員進行深度訪談，想要了解 他們對性騷擾與委員會任務的認知，及實際在委員會的執行內涵與困境。本文研究發現委員們 強調具體被呈現於可討論的「性騷擾」證據、主觀的任務解讀之現象、取決於主管機關態度的 作為等落差。因此研究提出四點建議，提供再思考的面向：（一）獨立委員會的考量：合併委 員會的情況下，促進議題間產生排擠的情況；就性騷擾議題完備被思考的情況下，獨立委員會 應是較適宜的方式；（二）提升對性騷擾的重視與態度：性騷擾是一個存在的社會現象，改變 該現象的過程，應提升所有人對性騷擾的重視，而非僅是當成例行事項的辦理；（三）新進委 員的任務建構與持續的訓練：讓委員們清楚理解自己的任務與功能，及持續的教育訓練，促進 專家委員能有更好的功能發揮；（四）促進委員協助不同任務：依委員專業促進其於不同任務 的參與協助，對委員會在此議題上更有助益。

The tasks of Sexual Harassment Prevention Committee are set in the Sexual Harassment Prevention Act. The biggest difference from other committees is not only giving consultations and suggestions in the meetings but also increasing its function of grievance investigation and Mediation. How do the exterior members explain their roles and missions based on their professional knowledge and experiences? How do they explain the differences between normative and actual tasks in Sexual Harassment Prevention Committee? The purpose of this paper is to provide an understanding of the members’ interpretations of sexual harassment, including their tasks, their actual context and difficult. This study interviewed 14 members of Sexual Harassment Prevention Committee from 7 counties in Taiwan and finds three gaps, such as specific sexual harassment evidences, subjective interpretations of committee tasks, and behaviors base on attitude of administrative institution. This paper also provides four suggestions to rethinking Sexual Harassment Prevention Committee. First, the sexual harassment prevention committee should be independent in order to consider the questions of sexual harassment completely. Secondly, the more emphasis should be put on the sexual harassment theme. Thirdly, the committee’s members should get more information and reeducation about their missions. Finally, promote the members to access and assist in some programs what are related to their professions.