近年來隨著車輛激增，駕駛者與乘員於交通事故受到傷亡比例上升，因此造成車輛安全性問題受到重視，為解決此類問題，世界先進國家皆制定各自的車輛撞擊測試法規來保障駕駛者與乘員之安全。以側面撞擊測試法規作爲說明，現今各國側撞法規在測試方式存在著相當大的差異，因而造成一輛汽車經過不同測試法規而得到許多不同的結果。為了減少測試法規的差異性，國際調和研究協會正積極針對側撞法規內容進行調和之工作，以達到側撞法規的全球化。本研究將以全車側撞測試法規為研究項目，針對法規內容與側撞測試法規的差異性進行探討，以了解國外制定側撞法規的依據；本研究對全車側撞測試法規之探討除可以提供側撞法規調和之參考，尚且可以提供台灣未來訂定國內側撞法規之依據。

The number of cars is increasing, leading to more traffic accidents. Traffic accidents have become one of the leading causes of death in modern times. Car safety has become the most important issue in automobile development. To confirm vehicle occupant safety, most countries issue safety standards and regulations to which vehicles must conform. For the side impact test regulation, the regulations produced by each country have a lot of difference in test methods, causing confusing data after tests. In order to reduce the difference between side impact regulations, International Harmonized Research Activities positively harmonized contents of side impact regulations to make it globalized. Based on the FMVSS 214 and ECE R95 regulation, the difference of full-scale side impact crash test is discussed in this study. Through all these analytical results, the references will be provided and harmonized side impact regulation will be understood clearly. At last, the result of this research also gives some suggestions to legislate Taiwan side impact regulation.