郭店楚簡於1993 年出土， 至今將近二十年。其墓葬中包含儒、道兩家文獻， 對於兩家文獻的傳世過程，有著足以釐清部分疑點的重要學術價值。然而，在文 意的解嶺上， 文字字形隸定仍是最基礎也是最重要的工作本篇文章在筆者不滿 餘的錯鮮 足於現有關於《老子》乙中，有關於字形隸定情況下，透 過相關字形的比較、對於現有說法的疑問，進而找尋出此一字形其他隸定的可能性。

Laozi in Guadian Chu slips was unearthed in 1993. Up to now, it is already twenty years. The document of Confucian and Taoist are buried in this grave. It is paramount for the process of inheriting from the document of Confucian and Taoist and also has important academic value to clarify some debates. However, interpretation of context, morphological of words still belongs to most basic and important work. In this article, the author is dissatisfied with classification of morphological in Laozi at preset. Through compared classification of morphological, the author doubts about current argument and then uncover another possibility about morphological.