本文從1990年代起深受空間政治經濟取向影響的新自由主義地理為基礎，並且以當前引起普遍國際爭論的兩種回應新自由農業的地理思潮─「後生產論」與「農業多功能性」作為對話的參考架構，用以探索臺灣當前農業體制變遷與農地利用轉型之社經趨力。本文主張，若要抵抗新自由化的潛在風險，相較於後生產論，農業多功能性或可提供體質較健全的替選途徑。然而，臺灣經驗深受1990年代國家發展邁向新自由化階段的調節路徑演化影響，不均等的城鄉發展關係使新農業體制看似較為傾向於後生產論，企圖設定與新自由主義相容的農業改革，藉此創造新的空間生產以利彈性資本積累。此一結構性障礙，實乃造成臺灣農地資源持續流失及相對弱勢的瓶頸。

In this study of the emergent neoliberal geography based on critical spatial political economy, two reference frameworks that have caused widespread international arguments, ‘postproductivism’ and ‘agricultural multifunctionality’, were used to explore the socio-economic driving force behind Taiwan’s new create new production of space for flexible capital accumulation. The structural malfunction has caused a bottleneck due to loss of farmland resources and relative deprivation in agricultural sector.agricultural regime and farmland transformation. The research results suggest that, compared to postproductivism, multifuntionality may provide a healthier alternative against the disastrous neolibralism. In Taiwan, which has been influenced by state regulation, the new transiting regime apparently favors the route towards postproductivism and is attempting to implement agricultural reforms that conform to neoliberal ideology to create new production of space for flexible capital accumulation. The structural malfunction has caused a bottleneck due to loss of farmland resources and relative deprivation in agricultural sector.