許多受到當代政治思想存有論轉向影響的研究者，採取存有論的角度詮釋、檢討法國思想家洪希耶的政治書寫。相對而言，認真思考洪希耶在晚近的書寫中對政治存有論的批評，並進一步透過這些批評探討其歷史與政治書寫獨特性的研究者，則不多見。本文的目的即在於疏理洪希耶的歷史與政治書寫，說明其書寫與政治存有論雖有若干共同關注，但是藉由知識創作論與政治創作論證明平等預設，毋寧才是其書寫的底蘊，也是其抵抗政治存有論誘惑的關鍵。

There has been considerable attention drawn to French philosopher Jacques Rancière’s works in recent years. Amongst critics inspired by the ontological turn in contemporary political theories, many have lamented Rancière’s failure to provide a sufficient account of the ontological status of the key concepts and presuppositions such as “equality of anyone and everyone” employed in his writings. Yet, by far, only relatively few have noticed Rancière’s open criticism of political ontology, not to mention the fact that Rancière has conceived his works as poetics. This essay is an attempt to investigate the trajectory and dispositive of Rancière’s historical and political writings, seeking to clarify Rancière’s resistance against the temptation of ontology and its further implications.