本文以「中國哲學詮釋的思維取向及其人文意識」為主題，在古今對比與中西對比的二重性論域中，提出當代中國哲學詮釋所不能有所迴避的問題——「真實的意義究竟能夠如何顯豁？」；作者乃進而以「道」思維的基源問題為例，反省當代道家的哲學詮釋是否已然經由「自然」、「無為」以至於「無不為」的價值理序，以及從「無」到「有」的存在理序的雙向進路，探入道家的人文視域與價值論域。其間，老子與莊子的人文關懷與生命關懷，實為任何道家詮釋者所不能有所輕忽的核心意義，而在道家的知性思辯與價值實踐二者看似對立的義理脈絡之間，如何展開「不言之辯，不道之道」的生命自我探索，並同時展現生命律動以臻生命美感之境界，更是吾人於詮釋歷程中不能丟失的解題之鑰——只因道家本始之關切已然超乎概念與理論之制限，而始終指向存在之基與生命之源。

In the dualistic field of comparing the ancient and the contemporary as well as the Chinese and the western, revolving around “the interpretative orientation of Chinese Philosophy and its humanist consciousness, this article asks a question that the contemporary interpretation of Chinese philosophy can not avert: “How indeed the meaning of truthfulness be revealed?” Furthermore, demonstrating through the fundamental question of Taoist thought, the writer reviews whether the philosophical interpretation of Taoism has moved from the dual approaches of the value order of “nature,” “non-action” and “nothing left undone” and the existential order of “nothingness” and “being” to the humanist domain and value domain of Taoism. Among other Taoists, Laozi and Zhuangzi’s concerns about humanism and life are the central meanings that no interpreters of Taoism can neglect. On the other hand, between the seemingly opposite contexts of the intellectual speculation and value practice of Taoism, the critical key in one’s progression of interpretation is how to begin the self-exploration about life in terms of “the argument that needs no words, and the Way that is not to be trodden” and show the aesthetics of the movement of life—since the fundamental concern of Taoism has transcended the limits of concepts and theories, pointing to the foundation of being and the source of life.