文章詳目資料

哲學與文化 A&HCICSSCI

  • 加入收藏
  • 下載文章
篇名 湛軒洪大容的「人物均」論探究 ——朝鮮後期人物性同異論爭的演變與其意義
卷期 41:8=483
並列篇名 A Study on Dam-Hun’s Theory of “Equality of Human Being and the Other Living Things” — The Change of “Inmulsŏngdongiron” and Its Significance in the Late Choson Dynasty
作者 李演都
頁次 099-113
關鍵字 湛軒洪大容人物性同異論人物均論氣一元論以天視之物學Dam-Hun Hong Dae-YongInmulsŏngdongiron Inmulgyŏn Silhak Giyilwonron Yicheonsiji In Mulhak A&HCI
出刊日期 201408

中文摘要

湛軒洪大容是一位朝鮮性理學在人物性同異論爭演變過程中的代表思想家之一。他對於人性與物性的說法,可概括為「人物均」,即「人與物之均一」。其人物均論,雖然繼承了洛學所說人物性同的看法,但是與傳統的說法在特質上有所不同。關於人與自然的關係,湛軒以氣一元論的世界觀與自然科學的思惟方式為基礎,提出自然與人都是氣活動的產物。據他所言,作為一個生命原理的仁,是人與物共具的理。傳統性理學用道德本體之理來闡釋自然界的運行,以便確定道德規律的絕對性與普遍性。然而,洪大容卻用作為自然界的普遍性原理的仁概念來解釋理,以便脫離於以人為中心的思惟模式。 洪大容不同意人與物的一切差別,他認為在地球上的一切生命體都具備操縱自己身體的神妙能力,即「心」之功能。洪大容認為,雖然其在現實世界上的具體實現有多層次,但內在於一切生命體的心體是同一的。洛學雖然主張人物性同,但是認定在心的方面上有明顯的差別。然而,洪大容卻認為人性與物性在心的本體上沒有如此的差別。由此觀之,他所說的人物心本同可說是洛學心論之擴張。一切萬物是在理與心的層次上同一,而人與人之間的差異或人與物的差別,只取決於氣之清濁而已。由此,洪大容反對在道德價值上人類對動物的優越性,而從客觀普遍性自然學的觀點來看待人與物。他的這種觀點可以說為朝鮮後期學術界提供了物學的基礎。至於他在人性與物性論辯的格局上,已擺脫心性論的框架而轉換為人與物之價值上的差異問題。在這個意義上,湛軒的人物均論可以說是人物性同論之轉換。

英文摘要

Hong Dae-Yong, pen name Dam-Hun, demonstrates the process and features of theoretical change of “Inmulsŏngdongiron (the theory of whether human nature and things nature are same or different)”, and his idea can be summarized as Theory of “Inmulgyŏn (Equality of human being and the other living things)”. While Dam-Hun inherits the position of Nak sector school (a sector that supports the theory that human being and an animal have same nature), he also shows the different characters from the previous arguments. In the relations between human beings and nature, based on the scientific understanding and the doctrine of material force as the principal, Dam-Hun sees both nature and a human being as a being which consist of the activity of Material Force, ki. He suggested the concept In (benevolence) as the common pneuma inherent in a human being and an animal, and asserted that this In is the universal principle, Li. The traditional Zhu-Xi school tried to secure the moral absolutes by explaining the nature system using SungLi (nature as universal principle). In contrast, Dam-Hun could overcome the human-centered system of thought by explaining the principle, Li using In, the universal principle of the nature system. He thought that there is no difference between the human being and all the living things have the same brilliant Virtue. He said that although the appearance that the Mind reveals in reality is different, the brilliant Virtue inherent in every living thing is the same. Nak sector school saw that the nature of human being is the same as the one of an animal, but didn’t admit that the mind is identical. However, Dam-Hun saw that a human being and an animal have no differences from each other in the entity of the Mind. In this respect, his theory can be seen as the extension of Nak sector school’s Theory of the Mind. All things are the same, if seen in the level of Li and Mind, and the differences, among human beings, and between an human being and an animal, result from whether the natural born ki, material force is pure or not. Dam-Hun freed himself from the viewpoint that the human being is superior to other beings in its moral value, and saw both of them from the universal point of view. This viewpoint of his provided the academic community in the late Choson Dynasty with a basis of science. He made it possible for “Inmulsŏngdongiron” to go beyond the frame of Theory of Mind and Nature, and to change into the matter of differences in values. In this sense, Dam-Hun’s philosophy, Theory of Equality of human and the other living things can be regarded as the changeover of “Inmulsŏngdongiron (the theory that human being and a things have same nature)”.

相關文獻