「公民1985行動聯盟」透過臉書倡議修改軍審法配套措施，成功達成訴求。本研究採取 「電子符號行動者」理論依據，強調網路活躍言者的符號行動，在於增益公共溝通、促進意見 交流、攻錯，其最終符號行動效果，必有其「可交代性」等待審視評估。基此，本研究運用論 題取徑分析，期能釐清「公民1985行動聯盟」在其論辯實踐過程中，所形塑「倫理責任」的說 服策略，是如何界定我群與他群的關係，是否隱涵意念框架的問題。經由「公民1985行動聯 盟」臉書貼文的論題分析對照網友留言，發現確實具有「思想引導術語」作用，促成「覆誦」 效果，主要是激發網民共同指責與謾罵宣洩情緒，深化甚或是僵化我群與他者間的認知差異， 無益於網路社會中個別的符號行動者的自由連結與意見攻錯，更難以達成公民社會中人我關係 的重新定位，恐將成為網路社會運動的一大隱憂。

The campaign of Citizen 1985 successfully advocated amending the Military Justice Act on the Facebook. Based on the theory of Electronic Symbolic Actors, this study emphasizes that the purpose of internet activists’ symbolic action is to promote public communication and exchange of views. The final effect of the action will have its accountability to be reviewed. Therefore, this study makes use of the topical approach in the hope of clarifying how the Citizen 1985 uses the “ethical responsibility” as its persuasive strategy formed in the course of the debate and practice to define the relation between “us” and “them”, and whether there are any hidden ideas underneath. Moreover, the study conducted a comparative analysis between the topics posted by Citizen 1985 on Facebook and the comments of internet users, and discovered the existence of the “thought-guiding terms” which resulted in the “chain out” effect. The effect is to stimulate internet users to criticize and vent their emotions, and to deepen or even harden the discrepancy between “us” and “them”. This does no good to the free connection and exchanges of individual electronic symbolic actors on the internet. This effect even makes it more difficult to redefine self-other relation in a civil society, and thus becomes a serious concern of the social movement in the internet age.