本文目的在於回顧自1960年以來到現在為止的韓國易學研究歷程，總結了其間易學研究在不同階段以何種內容、方向與觀點發展的問題。本文首先設定了研究時期的區分、研究成果、主要被研究的易學者和通過主題分類的多樣研究領域等幾種參照標準。嘗試利用這幾種參照標準，把近五十年韓國易學研究成果，以易學研究的方法論、易學的理論思維和易學與現代學術思潮的關係等問題為中心進行述評。1960-1970年代，可以說是易學研究的沉寂期；1980與1990年代，則為易學研究的回升期與跳躍期；1980年代後半期以來，隨著韓國經濟的騰飛，韓國易學的研究與影響亦相應得以迅速發展；2000年以後，韓國進入了易學研究的一個深化時期，又進入了高度專題化研究階段。近五十年來的韓國易學研究，在諸多方面都取得了豐碩的成果。儘管如此，還是存在看似將中國易學與韓國易學視作被分離的不同領域的傾向。這也許是一種經典中的普世價值與詮釋者身處的地域特性之間的張力。當然，儘管體現中國和韓國在各自不同地域研究的《周易》研究之特殊性很重要，但若因此而忽視《周易》原典所具有的普遍涵義在本質上具有一致性，也是困難的。在韓國研究《周易》的人適應日益多樣化的社會和文化發展的要求，體現了試圖將《周易》與之融合的積極的詮釋態度。這在《周易》具有的本質具體化方面是積極的。然而，在韓國儘管《周易》研究的取向在橫向上體現出多邊化、多樣化是積極的，但同時應更強化對《周易》原典和相關資料的基礎研究的縱向深層研究。

This paper aimed to recall the development process of research on the study of Zhou Yi in Korea from the 1960s to the present and overall review the issues on what development was made in terms of the content, direction and perspective of the research on the study of Zhou Yi at different stages during the period. First of all, this paper intends to set several frames of reference including various research areas through dividing the research period and categorizing research outcomes, the related researchers and targets. It aims to review the outcomes of the study of Zhou Yi in Korea over the past 50 years based on several reference frames, focusing on the issues including research methodology, thinking system and the relationship between the study of Zhou Yi and modern academic trends. The period from the 1960s to 1970s can be regarded as an academic stagnation of the study of Zhou Yi. The period from the 1980s to 1990s was when the study of Zhou Yi was recovered and taken off. With a rapid growth of the Korean economy after the late 1980s, the research and influence of the study of Zhou Yi also rapidly developed. The research on the study of Zhou Yi in Korea since 2000 reached the stage of intensification as well as an extremely professionalized research stage. The research on the study of Zhou Yi in Korea over the last 50 years made very abundant achievements in several aspects. However, despite such achievements, some regard the study of Zhou Yi in China and Korea as different areas. This may be the conflict between the universal values of scriptures and the regional features of the interpreters. Of course, it is obviously important to demonstrate the distinct characteristics of the researches on Zhou Yi in different regions of China and Korea. However, the research should not overlook the fact that the universal implications and principles of the original text, Zhou Yi are essentially united. The researchers who study Zhou Yi in Korea have an active attitude in interpretation to understand Zhou Yi and combine it with this modern times by timely meeting the demands of the diversified society and cultural development. It is positive in terms of materializing the essentials of Zhou Yi. However, while it is clearly positive that the trend in the study of Zhou Yi in Korea has become horizontally diversified and varied, it seems that there should be more vertically deep researches such as the basic research on the original text of Zhou Yi and relevant resources.