《閹雞》是個極富歷史情感的文學作品，不論是故事中的角色經歷，還是對於日本統治時期下的台灣遭遇，與思想未開化的大時代之下產生的悲劇都有著深層的意義，這帶著多層面情感的作品，在文體上經過小說到劇本的轉變，最後真實於舞台上演出，並在時隔六十五年後被重製，是個有分析比較價值的作品。本論文將張文環小說版、林摶秋劇本版、王友輝修編之劇本版，三者相互比較，試以「作品意識」、「寫作手法」、「情感表現」三個面向作為觀點切入，分析小說與劇本在意識傳達、結構形式與情感呈現上的差異，探究各作家身處之社會背景與關心面向的不同，產生出不同的作品意識，以及學習工作歷程的不同產生不同的寫作手法，比較三位作家筆下相同之題材的《閹雞》展現出的不同樣貌。

"Yan Ji" is a very emotional literary history, whether the roles theirs experience in the story, or a tragedy for under the Taiwan experience. And ideas under the reign of Japan uncivilized era produced have a deeper meaning, which with multi-level emotion works through the novel in style to change the script. The last real performances on stage, and the remake of a lapse after sixty-five years, is an analysis comparing the value of the works. This paper will comparative of the novel version from Wen Haun Chang, theater version from Tuan Qiu Lin and revision of the script version from Yo Hui Wang. Three compared try to "work consciousness", "writing style", "emotional expression" three-oriented point of view as a cut opinion, analysis novels and scripts in the consciousness of communication, structure and emotional rendering differences on every writer to explore the social context of living with different aspects of care. Resulting in different consciousness produces different works, as well as the course of study and work in different writing style. These three writers wrote the same theme, but "Yan Ji" showing different appearances.