文章詳目資料

藝術學報

  • 加入收藏
  • 下載文章
篇名 Teresa M Amabile創造力動機理論於造形創造力的適用性與差異性研究
卷期 97=11:2
並列篇名 A study of using Amabile's creativity motivation principles in gestaltung creativity
作者 李堅萍朱素直劉蕙儀
頁次 001-018
關鍵字 Amabile創造力動機造形創造力Creativity motivationGestaltung creativityTHCI
出刊日期 201510

中文摘要

「創造力」是台灣少數得以於世界舞台爭雄的利器,Harvard大學Teresa M. Amabile創造 力理論一直具有高度影響力,但是否也適用於本地?本研究目的為探究Amabile創造力動機理論 於造形創造力的(1)適用性與(2)差異性。經發展研究工具「Amabile創造力動機調查問卷」 與「造形創造力評量表」,以Amabile創造力動機九策略進行教學,調查206名學生創造力動機 與造形創造力内涵。結論:(1) Amabile創造力動機理論的確亦適用於造形創造力。(2) Amabile 創造力動機理論14個細項於高造形創造力者仍有7項差異。建議後續研究鎖定大量樣本調查低 創造力者的創造力動機。

英文摘要

To cultivate creativity may be the most important instructional purposes of visual arts departments. Teresa M. Amabile, a professor of Harvard University, supposed the "Componential Model of Creativity (CMC) " theory. Therefore, this study wanted to examine whether or not the creativity motivation principles of CMC is suitable to ceramic gestaltung creativity in Taiwan. The puiposes are to investigate (1) the applicability and (2) the differences of Amabile5 creativity motivation principles in ceramic gestaltung creativity. After instmction of using Amabile 5s 9 creativity motivation strategies and the questionnaire sui*vey of 206 students, creativity motivation and gestaltung creativities, the results are: ( 1) the Amabile5 creativity motivation principles are suitable to ceramic gestaltung creativity. ( 2 ) The seven fourteen sub-items of the Amabile's creativity motivation principles still were not suitable for excellent gestaltung creativity artists. The suggestion is to investigate continually mass samples5 creativity motivations of low-level gestaltung creativity.

相關文獻