本文以裴松之《三國志注》中引用的三部史籍：韋昭《吳書》、胡沖《吳曆》、張勃《吳錄》作為考察對象。由於三本書名皆有一「吳」字，其作者也都是仕於東吳或來自江東門閥士族的人物，故本文統稱為「三吳之書」。其在三國史的研究領域中，屬於《裴注》的一環，而本文認為《裴注》的研究分為兩大區塊，大致而言：其一，《裴注》引用諸書，但凡在陳壽撰《三國志》前已存的，其內容為何遭陳壽刪棄？其二，《裴注》中所列出《三國志》問世後的史書，它們又如何補充和挑戰陳壽建構的三國史？總之，本文以《三國志》和《裴注》皆作為史料的觀點，將彼此放入三國史的脈絡中考察，重新發現三國史的新圖像，從而建構較為真實的三國歷史。

This thesis discusses of three historical books in Pei Songzhi‘s Annotation for The History of the Three Kingdoms: Wei Zhao’s Wushu (or Book of Wu), Hu Chong’s Wuli (or History of Wu), and Zhang Bo’s Wulu (or Records of Wu) as the object of investigation. Since the three books titles there is a "Wu" word, its authors are also Eastern Wu’s official or born in a noble family, so those historical books referred to herein as “Three Books of Wu” in this thesis. Those books in the study fields of Three Kingdoms histories belonges to Pei Songzhi‘s Annotations. And this thesis take research perspective as there are two research category of Pei Songzhi‘s Annotation for The History of the Three Kingdoms. In general, First research category pay attention to texts used in Pei Songzhi’s annotations which written before Chen Shou’s Records of Three Kingdoms, but not used by Chen Shou. Second research category pay attention to how does Pei Songzhi add or challenge some point of Chen Shou’s through choose those texts in his annotations which written after Chen Shou’s Records of Three Kingdoms. In short, This thesis take the view point as Records of Three Kingdoms and Pei Songzhi‘s Annotation for The History of the Three Kingdoms are both historical books. And try to put two books to each other’s historical narrative, to rediscover the images of Three Kingdoms history, and then construct the history of Three Kingdoms more real.