鑑於酒駕問題已經造成臺灣重大的社會成本，法務部幾次修法， 都在努力降低酒後駕車可能造成的傷害，同時也希望能夠透過生命教 育的方式有效地降低酒駕次數，但是，目前關於酒駕之生命教育仍画 待確認輔導方向，'因此本硏究希望探究可能影響酒駕次數的內在园素 (歸因方式、自我效能）及外在行爲（飲酒行爲），以供參酌。 本硏究的目的在於了解成年個案負向事件歸因方式、自我效能與 飲酒行爲對酒後駕車次數的影響。硏究以歸因類型量表、一般性自我 效能釐表、最近三個月飲酒量與飲酒頻率問卷爲測量工具《總樣本 103位成年男性中，個案組（72名）來自參加新竹地檢署酒駕生命教 育個案與臺大醫院新竹分院精神科酒癮評估門診個案，對照組（31 名）選樣自新竹市一般市民。統計分析方面，我們先採取相關性分 析，接著使用階層式線性迴歸分析相關性分析結果顯示，自變項（負面事件歸因方式一內在歸面方 式、全面歸國方式、穩定歸國方式，自我效能，飲酒行爲一飲酒頻 率、飲酒量）彼此間之相關均未達顯著。然穩定歸因方式、飲酒頻 率、單日平均飲酒量都與酒駕次數有顯著相關《 階層式線性迴歸分析結果顯示，控制變項中，年紀較大者酒駕次 數顯著較高，離婚或喪偶者相較於未婚者酒駕次數顯著較高。自變項 中，穩定性歸因方式程度愈高者，酒駕次數顯著較少；飲酒頻率愈低 者，酒駕次數顯著較少《穩定性歸因方式可能透過飲酒頻率（部分中 介變項）而影響酒駕次數。臨床實務中，對酒駕者進行歸因方式之霄平 估與治療，可能降低飲酒頻率並預防酒駕再犯。

Drunk driving has resulted in enormous costs in Taiwanese society. With repeatedly amending legislation, Ministry of Justice attempted to reduce potential harms caused by drunken driving. It is also expected that life education can reduce the number of drunk driving incidents. Clear guidance of life education for drunk driving has not yet been clearly identified; the purpose of this study is to investigate the impacts of internal factors (attributional style, self-efficacy) and external factor (drinking behavior) on the number of drunk driving incidents. This study aimed to investigate the impacts of attributional style to negative events, self-efficacy and drinking behavior on the number of drunk driving among adults. Measurement instruments included Attributional Styles Questionnaire, General Self-Efficacy Scale, and the questionnaire on drinking amount and frequency in recent 3 months. The total sample consisted of 103 male adults. The samples in the case group (n = 72) were recruited from participants of the life education course in the Hsin-chu District Prosecutor’s Office and patients seeking evaluations in the alcoholism clinic in the Department of Psychiatry, Hsin-chu Branch of National Taiwan University ; the samples in the control group (n = 31) were taken from general populations in Hsin-chu City. We first conducted correlation analysis, and then employed hierarchical linear regression in our analyses. The results of correlational analysis showed that there were no significant correlations between independent variables (attributional style, self-efficacy, drinking amount, and drinking frequency). Stable attributional style, drinking frequency and average daily drinking amount were significantly correlated with the number of drunk driving. The results of the hierarchical linear regression indicated that individuals who were older and divorced/widowed (versus single) were more likely to drive while drunk. In terms of independent variables, it was found that higher levels of stable attribution were significantly associated with less number of drunk driving; lower drinking frequency was significantly related to less number of drunk driving. Stable attribution may influence drunk driving via drinking frequency (a partial mediator). In clinical practice, evaluation and treatment for attributional style would reduce drinking frequency and prevent future episodes of drunk driving.