自2001年3月起，財團法人台灣網路資訊中心(TWNIC)委託資策會科技法律研究所與台 北律師公會，作為我國之網域名稱爭議處理機構，為觀察網域名稱爭議處理機制於我國的 運作情形，本文蒐集自2001年3月起至2014年12月止，前開機構所作成之爭議決定書，並對 之進行統計分析，經篩選後共計有184筆，其中有146件申訴可成功獲得移轉網域名稱之決 定，比例為79.3%；另有11件申訴獲得取消網域名稱之決定，占6%，申訴成功之比例合計 為85.3%。前開爭議審查結果之分布情形，亦與世界智慧財產權組織(WIPO)處理網域名稱爭 議的比例相近，且大多數的爭議當事人都能服膺此爭議處理程序之決定，僅有10件仍繼續 提起民事訴訟，比例僅有5.4%。透過羅吉斯迴歸分析(logistic regression)的結果發現，近年 來雖有「註冊人不提出答辯，則申訴將被認為有理由」之傾向(p -value=0.004, Standardized Coefficient=-2.895)，但筆者認為從法詮釋學的角度而言，基於網域名稱的公益性質，縱然有 前開情況，建議專家仍應踐行職權調查程序，不宜僅因註冊人未提出答辯，而逕認申訴有理 由。

This study aims at domain name dispute resolution in R.O.C. Since March 2001, Science and Technology Law Institute and Taipei Bar Association have been regarded as the dispute resolution mechanism. Over 184 cases have been processed from Mar. 2001 to Dec. 2014. Generally speaking, of the 184 sifted cases, 85.3% complaints were accepted, including 146 complaints transferred (79.3%), 11 complaints under cancellation (1.6%) and only 10 complaints continuing to sue in civil courts (5.4%). Apparently, the distribution result of domain name dispute resolution in Taiwan is similar to that of WIPO. The result of logistic regression (p -value=0.004, Standardized Coefficient=-2.895) might be analyzed as“if registrars don't response, complaints tend to be accepted.＂However, despite the analytic tendency, panels are still believed to have the duty to go through the whole investigative procedure based on the public benefit characteristic of domain name.