一般認為丕平 (Robert B. Pippin) 把黑格爾置於先驗哲學的傳統中，視黑 格爾的哲學為一種擴展的先驗哲學。然而這似乎並不是丕平所提出的唯一一 種黑格爾解釋。根據他的另一種解讀，黑格爾的哲學並不是一種由一系列的 先驗論證所構成，而是一系列的敘事說明 (narrative account)。 本文的目的在於探究丕平之解讀本身的理論問題。首先我將說明丕平對 黑格爾的先驗論證解讀，繼之根據丕平的著作，證明他對於黑格爾有另一種 詮釋；最後，我將要討論使得丕平由前者轉向後者的理論因素，並且追問他 的敘事說明解釋所留下的問題。

Generally, it is thought that Robert Pippin locates Hegel in the tradition of transcendental philosophy and conceives his philosophy as a kind of extended transcendental philosophy. However, this seems not to be the only way in which Pippin interprets Hegel. According to his another reading, Hegel’s philosophy does not consist of a series of transcendental arguments, but a series of narrative accounts. In this paper, I will at first explain Pippin’s transcendental reading of Hegel and, in the second step, demonstrate that Pippin indeed proposes another interpretation of Hegel. I will then explore the theoretical reasons that drive Pippin from his transcendental reading of Hegel to the latter, narrative account reading. I will also discuss questions remaining to be answered for the narrative account interpretation