為何在亞太地區難以形成類似「北大西洋公約組織」具體而有效力 的安全共同體?針對這一個問題,學界以歐洲建構安全共同體所謂的三大支柱一「集體認同」、「區域主義」以及「多邊主義根源」一檢驗並 論證東南亞國協形塑安全共同體的條件與侷限。本文試圖自「安全治理」 的角度,經由不同理論觀點的對比,探討東協透過「東協區域論壇」在 東亞區域主義變遷的環境下建構安全共同體的機會與限制;在實踐層面 的檢視,本文以最近「2003年巴里第二宣言」揭橥的立基於東協安全體,東協經濟體以及東協社會文化體「三大支柱」的共同體目標為主,評估東協安全共同體的前景。
For what reasons that Asian-Pacific states failed to construct a powerful security community similar to NATO in European region? As opposed to European Security Community’s solid infrastructures - collective identity, regionalism, and the origins of multilateralism, ASEAN gas been rooted in a highly-divided socio-cultural circumstances. This paper aims to explore the opportunities and challenges of ASEAN’s endeavors to construct a £security community' from the viewpoint of 'security goveraance' and takes the recent c2003 Bali Concord IT as a case of content analysis.