表面上而言，尤克斯事件雖說是俄國政府單純的追討逃漏 稅案例，但事實上卻揭露了俄國現階段政經發展上的許多問 題。其中，最重要的問題在於，突顯出過去經濟轉型錯誤私有 化政策之貽害 － 社會資源集中化致使貧富差距擴大之社會不 均。然而，以自由主義為理論基礎的經濟全球化，強調市場自 由，政府對市場經濟的干預行為通常會引來質疑。以尤克斯事 件為例，俄國政府加強查緝逃漏稅，雖非著眼於獲取所得重分 配效益來改善俄國當前最為人詬病的貧富不均現象，而是希望 藉此強化政府對俄國經濟發展具有重大影響力且具有不完全競 爭性質的石油生產部門之掌控能力，贏取長期資源的公平分配 效益。但此次干預舉動卻立刻引起國內外投資者對俄國市場自 由化信心的動搖，影響外來投資，甚至可能導致本國資金外移 之負面效應。事實上，在市場自由競爭掛帥的經濟全球化下， 雖帶來許多正面經濟效應，卻也極易落入所謂托拉斯化的資本 主義：社會資源越趨集中化，形成貧富差距擴大、社會不均等 現象。這種問題不僅發生於俄國，台灣近年來為了因應全球化 競爭而進行的民營化和金融改革等經濟變革，亦引發許多爭 議。因此，自由化競爭與社會公平之衝突已經是經濟全球化後 普遍存在於各國的經濟現象。若政府要矯正市場扭曲，改善市 場寡占或壟斷結構，理論上，股權分散途徑乃是可行方案之一。然而，全球化競爭下，此途徑應注意哪些落實層面的問題？換言之，本文希望對於改善社會不均之政策，提出一個新的思維方式，以茲輔助過去傳統思考邏輯上，社會福利補貼及稅賦的所得重分配途徑。

Although the Yukos event is the simple case of Russian government's demanding for tax evasion, but in fact, it has revealed that there are many questions in the Russian political and economic development at present. Among them, the most important problem lies in the legacy trouble of wrong privatization policy during the past economic transformation - the concentration of social resources that leads the inequality of social gap between the rich and the poor expanding. However, the economic globalization takes liberalism as theoretical foundation, so it emphasizes free competition. Therefore, the behavior of government’s intervention in the market economy will usually attract the query. Taking the Yukos event as an example, the Russian government actively investigates and seizes the tax evasion, although with a view not to obtain income redistribution effects for improving the phenomenon of social inequality that Russian condemns at present, but hope to get the long-term effects of fair resources distribution by strengthening the government's ability of controlling on the production department of nature petroleum, because this industry has a character of imperfect competition and has great influence on the Russian economic development. Nevertheless, this measure immediately caused domestic and international investors to suspect liberalization of Russian market. It will influence the inflow of foreign investment and even cause the national capital to outflow. In fact, under the economic globalization on the basis of free market competition, although bring the economic effects, it is also easy to fall into the so-called “trustified capitalism”: social resources trend towards concentration, the gap between the rich and the poor is expanding and the social inequality. This kind of problem not only happens in Russia, but also in Taiwan. For example, in recent years Taiwan is going on the economic and financial reform for globalization competition. But it causes a lot of disputes. So, the conflicts between liberalization competitions and social equality generally exist in various countries after economic globalization. Thus, although in theory the approach of decentralized the total voting stock is one of the feasible methods to improve the oligopoly or monopoly of market structure and social inequality, but under globalization competition how to implement. The issue also will be discussed in this paper.