傳播媒體法律規範的研究，究竞是否「專屬」於傳統法學研究的 範疇，抑或是傳播研究領域内的「特殊」議題，甚至，因而不適用歷 來法學研究的方法？本篇文字，係根據作者參與「傳播媒體内容管制 規範之價値體系」研究所遭遇的相關方法（論）問題爲例，嘗試探索 「跨科際整合」研究在方法論上的實踐意涵。本篇結論認爲：過於急 切縱入方法操作而不反思其理論基礎，將無益於法學與傳播研究兩個 學科的接軌；將相關議題按不同學科既有研究重點硬行切割、再相互 搭連塊狀研究單元的不得已分工模式，亦非「跨科際整合」理想下所 應有的專業互動模式。終久之道，仍須就共通議題深入個別學科基礎 ，並且保持方法論上的自我批判態度，藉此發展學科之間眞正的合作 關係。

Does the research of media regulation norms, like legal issues in the other domains, exclusively fall into the field of traditional legal studies? Or, rather constitute those studies contemplated by communication researchers a specialized regime within their discipline and thus can justify marginalizing every legal method in this respect? The author documents some methodological problems that he has experienced in the project "Value System in Content Regulation of the Media". After exposing some underlying weaknesses and shortage of inter-disciplinary co-operation he then sums up with a critical and reflective stance. Any haste in dividing issues according to the status quo of each discipline or in grasping available methods would rarely contribute further to the interdisciplinary co-operation in a long-term point of view. Only after a common intellectual basis has been found, then there can be more promising outlooks for researchers to integrate achievements of both disciplines in exploring a new horizon.