作者分析了 2002年對中國新聞從業者和新聞專業學生的問 卷調查數據。結果顯示，受新聞改革和傳媒全球化的影響， 「黨的新聞事業」和「專業主義新聞J這兩大新聞範式在中國新 聞從業者當中並存。前者表現爲新聞人員對黨的喉舌的稱許， 後者更多地表現對西方主流媒體的讚揚；前者體現於新聞人員 強調媒體的對民宣講、爲民説話方面的功能，後者更多地體現 爲他們強調媒體的信息擴散功能；與前者相關的是新聞人員希 望加強黨的宣傳工作及官方的新聞理論等方面的訓練，與後者 相關的是他們希望加強廣博的人文教育。不同的新聞範式影響 之下，新聞人員對改革過程中出現的新型媒體也有不同的評 價。這些實證觀察在4種不同樣本中都存在，體現了新聞範式 的一些基本特徵，即内部統一、廣泛共享、對思維和判斷的規 範作用等。本文並探討了這些實證結果對我們理解新聞範式、 新聞專業主義、全球化和中國新聞改革過程的意義。

This paper reports findings from the 2002 surveys of China's journalists and journalism students. It shows that, under the influences of media reforms and media globalization, two journalistic paradigms, “party journalism” and “professional journalism,” now co-exist among China’s journalists. While the former is associated with praises for the Party organs, the latter has complements for the western media; while the former is rooted in emphasizing the media’s policy explanations and popular advocacy roles, the latter is buik upon the idea of the media as a disseminator; while the former is related to its emphasis on training in party propaganda policies and the official journalism theories, the latter tends to favor the teaching of a broad liberal arts education. These competing paradigms are also found to influence how journalists evaluate innovative media outlets that have emerged during the reforms. These observations reveal some basic characteristics of journalistic paradigms: an internally coherent configuration, broadly-shared ideas, and a structuration of adherents, reasoning and judgments. The implications of the findings for the understanding of journalistic paradigms, professionalism, globalization, and China’s media reforms are also discussed.