本文透過政策網絡分析架構，探討南部科學園區創新平台形成過程及其如何帶動產業升級與創新，進而可重新思考如何透過規劃手段，讓科學園區在創新活動可扮演更積極之角色。本文有以下四點發現。第一，開發主體部分，不同於竹科由中央主導的開發模式，南科醫療器材計劃與創新平台的概念，主要是由地方政府、地方研究機構與大學、南科管理局，共同分析地方產業結構的組成特性與轉型機會，彼此協力合作共同提出計畫。第二，科學園區可作為創新所需的公共空間或互動場域，以促進行動者之間的集體學習，進而推動產業升級與創新；科學園區管理單位則可以透過本身的資源與能力，成為公共空間的中介者與管理者。第三，創新平台是實踐公共空間與互動場域的重要工具，適當的功能結構與運作模式，可彌補形塑產業鏈與生產標的產品的缺口為目標進行規劃。第四，創新平台的管理者是平台有效運作的重要關鍵因素，以台灣經驗此角色可由管理局與在地研究機構共同擔任。

This paper uses a policy network analysis to reveal the ways that forms the innovation platform in Southern Taiwan Science Park (STSP) as well as leads the progressive and innovative of industries. Moreover, it is fruitful to re-consider about how planning method can help to renovate the weight of science parks occupy in all innovation activities. And the findings in this paper can be concluded into four points as below. The first is about the main structure of the development. It is central government who dominates the development of Hsinchu Science Park (HSP), whereas the concept of innovation platform of medical equipment planning is mainly constructed by local government, local research institute, university, and Southern Taiwan Science Park Administration (STSPA). This organization collaborate to analyze the characteristics of local industries and the potential opportunities for transformation, and propose a plan for further implementation. Secondly, science park is a public space and interactive area for innovation. The executors can improve their group learning in this space and proceed to promote the progressive and innovation. Meanwhile, the science park administration can become the medium and manager based on its own resources and capabilities. Furthermore, an innovation platform is a critical tool to put public space and interactive area into practice. A appropriate functional structure and operation mode can cover the gaps brought from industrial chain forming and target product production. The last point is that, the manager of the innovation platform is the key factor to operate the platform sufficiently. References from the previous experience in Taiwan, the science park bureau and local research institute can hold this rule jointly.