科技管理是一門新興發展、但也是一個蓬勃擴散的學科。隨著產業結構與經濟情勢的轉 變，從1980 年代晚期，科技管理逐漸從策略管理領域中分流出來，形成一個有主體性 的學術社群。在此，本文從三種策略分析角度：意志論、命定論、互動論，來分析與回 顧台灣科技管理研究的發展。我們以八本TSSCI 管理期刊為分析對象，蒐集2000~2014 年期間所出版的科技管理相關文獻，進行歸納與分析。我們指出，過去台灣的科管 研究多偏重於意志論的探討，互動論的分析相對特別少。考量學術的豐富性與多元性， 以及台灣的環境特殊性，互動論的科技與創新管理議題，應該是台灣學者未來可多著墨 的方向。

Technology and innovation management (TIM) is a new yet burgeoning discipline. Since the late 1980s, it has been an autonomous academic community separated from strategic management following changes in industry structures and economic conditions. In this paper, we aim to analyze and review the development of TIM studies in Taiwan through three common perspectives of strategic management–voluntarism, determinism, and interactionism. Articles on TIM published during 2000~2014 were drawn from eight TSSCI business-related journals for comparison. Our analysis shows that Taiwanese scholars tend to emphasize the voluntaristic view of TIM activities, while intentionally or unintentionally ignoring the possibility of interactionist explanations. Given the specificity of Taiwan’s national contexts and richness of theoretical perspectives, there is an imperative need to bring interactionism back into the scholarly community at least in Taiwan in the future.