當代法學的主流典範仍是「實證主義」，以及法理論上的釋義學，鑑於實證主義之下所型塑法釋義學的侷限，乃有不少法學者重新主張「政策法學」或「立法學」、「法政策學」的重要性。本文站在政策法學的立場，以「由法釋義學到政策導向之行政法學」為論題，並運用深度訪談方法，就相關學者專家的觀點加以佐證，並進一步論辯與釐析。在研究架構上，首先說明本文研究的緣起，其次闡述法釋義學的功能及其限制，復次說明立法學、法政策學及政策導向法學的內涵，再次對於重要研究議題的學者訪談內容加以評析，最後就相關重點議題作一論結，並指出政策法學在理論與實務上的確都具有可行性及發展性。

Contemporary mainstream paradigm of jurisprudence is still "positivism" theory and Dogmatik. Due to the limitations of Dogmatik method which positivism shaped, lots of legal scholars reassert the importance of "policy-oriented jurisprudence", "legislative research" or "legal policy research". This article is from the standpoint of policy-oriented jurisprudence to research the topic "The Jurisprudence of Administrative Law from Dogmatik to Policy-orientation". With depth interview method, the writer corroborates views of relevant scholars and makes further analysis. In the research framework, the article first describes the origin of this study, then explains the features and restrictions of Dogmatik. It then illustrates the content of legislative research, legal policy research as well as policy-oriented jurisprudence, and elaborates the important research topics for scholar interview. Finally the article will make a conclusion on key topics, then realizes that policy-oriented jurisprudence is certainly a feasible and developable approach in theory as well as practice.