背　景：英文版的出院準備度量表是用來評價病人的出院準備度。它已經被證實具有良好的信度和效度，但關於中文版出院準備度量表的信效度檢測還未見相關報導。
目　的：將出院準備度量表翻譯為中文並應用於喉切除術後病人進行信效度的檢測。
方　法：將英文版的出院準備度量表用回譯、語義等價性評價等方法翻譯成中文並進行預實驗。應用內容效度、結構效度、探索性因數分析法和Pearson相關分析來評價該量表的信度和效度。
結　果：中文版出院準備度量表的內容效度為0.97，各條目的內容效度為0 .75–1.00。量表總的 Cronbach’s α係數為 .97，探索性因數分析法得到3 個公共因數，三個因數之間呈顯著相 關。量表各維度得分和維度得分與量表總分之間的Pearson相關係數為.81- .97。
結　論：中文版的出院準備度量表具有良好的信度和效度，可以用於喉切除術後病人出院準備度的研究。

Background: TheReadiness forHospitalDischarge Scale (RHDS) was designed to assess the readiness of patients for discharge. The original English-language instrument has shown high degrees of reliability and validity, but no Chinese version of the scale has been verified.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to translate the RHDS into Chinese and assess the psychometric properties of this scale on laryngectomy patients in China.
Methods: The RHDS was translated into Chinese using forward and back translation, semantic equivalence assessment, and pilot testing. The content and construct validity, internal consistency, and internal reliability of the translated scale were assessed using exploratory factor analysis and Pearson correlation analysis.
Results: The content validity index of the developed Chinese version of the RHDS was .97, with the content validity indexes of RHDS items ranging between .75 and 1.00. The Cronbach’s ! coefficient for internal consistency was .97. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a three-factor structural model. All correlations among the three factor subscales were significant. Pearson’s correlation coefficients between subscale factors and the total scale ranged from .81 to .97.
Conclusions: The Chinese version of the RHDS is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing the discharge readiness of laryngectomy patients in China.