明代「後七子」領袖的李攀龍（1514-1570)編選《古今詩刪》，此部詩歌選本所透顯出來的意 識，即爲詩歌必須「復古」，於是所編選的古今詩人之詩作均可視爲「復古派」之典範。到了晚明， 竟陵派鍾惺（1574-1625)與譚元春（1586-1637)同樣透過編選詩歌選本《詩歸》來呈現自己的詩學 理論，並且欲以此與復古派之思潮相互抗衡。本文欲針對被譽爲「古今隱逸詩人之宗」的陶淵明，其 詩作入選之情形作進一步探討。一方面，凸顯兩者如何透過評選的方式，詮釋陶淵明及其詩，另一方 面，亦可觀看陶淵明在明代詩學的接受情形。

The leader of Hochiz，Li Panlong (1514-1570) edited “Gujinshishan” in the Ming dynasty. The consciousness of these choice poem must be “retro”，so the poems which was choice from the past to nowadays may be seen the paradigm of “retro school” • To the late of Ming dynasty，Jingling School Zhong Xing of Jingling School (1574-1625) and Tan Yuan Chun (1586-1637) also show their theory of poem by Shigui against retro school. This article for the known as the “The father of hidden poet in ancient age and modem age,9 - Tao Yuanming, to study how his poems was selected and edited deeply. We can suggest how the two men interpret Tao Yuanming and his poems by the selected poems ,in the other side, we also observed the condition of the Identity of Tao5s poems in the Ming Dynasty .